EON Corp IP Holdings LLC v. Sensus USA Inc et al

Filing 1098

ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO FILE CONSOLIDATED DOCUMENT IN SUPPORT OF SEALING re 1093 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal filed by Cisco Systems Inc, 1086 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal re Opposition to Motion f or Attorneys Fees filed by EON Corp IP Holdings LLC, 1064 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal filed by HTC America Inc, 1066 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal / EXHIBIT A to Declaration of Jameson TO BE FILED UNDER SEAL -- filed by Cisco Systems Inc, 1059 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Exhibits to Defendants' Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Sanctions filed by United States Cellular Corporation, 1067 Administrati ve Motion to File Under Seal re Motion for Attorney Fees [DKT 1060] filed by Sprint Spectrum L.P., 1094 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal filed by HTC America Inc, 1062 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal D eclaration and Exhibits In Support of Motion for Attorneys' Fees filed by Motorola Solutions, Inc., Motorola Mobility LLC, 1090 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal filed by United States Cellular Corporation Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on July 15, 2014. (jstlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/15/2014)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

EON CORP IP HOLDINGS LLC,

Case No. 12-cv-01011-JST

Plaintiff,
8
v.
9
10

CISCO SYSTEMS INC, et al.,
Defendants.

ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO
FILE CONSOLIDATED DOCUMENT IN
SUPPORT OF SEALING
Re: ECF Nos. 1059, 1062, 1064, 1066, 1067,

11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

1086, 1090, 1093, 1094.
12
13
The parties have filed nine different administrative motions to file numerous documents
14

under seal in connection with Defendants’ motion for attorneys’ fees. Many of the motions seek

15
to seal information declared confidential by another party, and the declarations by the party
16
supporting sealing are located at different locations on the docket. In some cases, the party
17
moving to seal has designated another party as the party supporting sealing, but that party then
18
identifies a different party as the party who actually supports sealing. See Declaration of John V.
19
Piccone ¶ 4 (ECF No. 1078). It also appears that some parties have made later requests to seal
20
information that the party did not initially move to seal. See Declaration of Bryan K. Anderson ¶
21
3 (ECF No. 1079).
22
The parties are ordered to file with the court a document identifying each specific item the
23
parties have sought to seal in connection with the pending motion for attorneys’ fees. The
24
document shall contain a chart in the following format. See Standing Order Governing
25

Administative Motions for File Materials Under Seal A-4 (“If a party seeks to seal numerous

26
documents, the Court will consider a chart that identifies the entity that designated each document
27
as confidential”).
28

1

Information sought to be sealed

Administrative
Motion Seeking
to Seal
Information

Party
Ultimately
Designating
Information
as Sealable

Declaration by
Designating Party in
Support of Sealing

Highlighted information in Exhibit
3 to Nagdev Declaration in support
of Defendants’ motion (Unredacted
version at ECF No. 1059-3).

ECF No. 1059

Motorola

Nagdev Declaration
¶ 5 (ECF No. 1059-1)

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

The chart should identify any information the parties have moved to seal but which no
declaration in support of sealing has been filed by the party who ultimately supports sealing.
The parties are ORDERED to file the chart within seven days of the date of this order.

10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

Dated: July 15, 2014
12
13

______________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2