EON Corp IP Holdings LLC v. Sensus USA Inc et al

Filing 365

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE ADR CERTIFICATION AND STIPULATION TO ADR PROCESS. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/6/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/6/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP STEVE MOORE (NC Bar No. . 23367) CARL E. SANDERS (NC Bar No. 34190) JAMES L. HOWARD (NC 39769) 1001 West Fourth Street Winston-Salem, NC 27101-2400 Telephone: 336 607 7300; Facsimile: 336 607 7500 E-mail: smoore@kilpatricktownsend.com E-mail: csanders@kilpatricktownsend.com E-mail: jihoward@kilpatricktownsend.com KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP JESSICA L. HANNAH (State Bar No. 261802) Two Embarcadero Center, 8th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: 415-576-0200; Facsimile: 415-576-0300 Email: jhannah@kilpatricktownsend.com Attorneys for Defendants MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC. AND MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC. 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 15 EON CORP. IP HOLDINGS, LLC, Plaintiff, 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 v. SENSUS USA INC.; ARUBA NETWORKS, INC.; BROADSOFT, INC.; CLAVISTER AB; IP.ACCESS, INC.; JUNI AMERICA, INC.; CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.; MAVENIR SYSTEMS, INC.; MERU NETWORKS, INC.; SERCOMM CORPORATION; SONUS NETWORKS, INC.; SPRINT SPECTRUM, L.P.; ADVANCED METERING DATA SYSTEMS, LLC; STOKE, INC.; TATARA SYSTEMS, INC.; HTC AMERICA, INC.; PALM, INC.; UNITED STATES CELLULAR CORPORATION; CELLULAR SOUTH, INC.; NTELOS, INC.; MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC.; MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC.; KINETO WIRELESS, INC.; and AIRVANA, INC., Defendants. Defendants. AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS Case No. C12-01011 EMC STIPULATED REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE ADR CERTIFICATION AND STIPULATION TO ADR PROCESS OR NOTICE OF NEED FOR ADR TELEPHONE CONFERENCE ; ORDER [CIVIL L.R. 6-2] STIPULATED REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE ADR CERTIFICATION AND STIPULATION TO ADR PROCESS OR NOTICE OF NEED FOR ADR TELEPHONE CONFERENCE CASE NO. C12-01011 MEJ 1 Plaintiff EON Corp. IP Holdings, LLC and Defendants Aruba Networks, Inc., Broadsoft, 2 Inc., Cisco Systems, Inc., Mavenir Systems, Inc., Meru Networks, Inc., Sercomm Corporation, 3 Sonus Networks, Inc., Sprint Spectrum, L.P., Stoke, Inc., Tatara Systems, Inc., HTC America, 4 Inc., United States Cellular Corporation, Motorola Mobility, Inc., Motorola Solutions, Inc., Kineto 5 Wireless, Inc., and Airvana Inc. (“the parties”) hereby request an extension of time to file the ADR 6 Certification and a Stipulation to ADR Process or Notice of Need for ADR Telephone Conference 7 (“ADR Documents”) pursuant to Northern District Civil L. R. 16-8 and ADR L. R. 3-5. 8 All parties, with the exception of Clavister AB and Juni America, Inc., met and conferred 9 this morning regarding the Joint Case Management Conference Statement and the ADR programs 10 made available by this Court. While no agreement was reached between the parties this morning 11 with respect to ADR, the parties believe that an extension of two weeks to file the ADR 12 Documents will provide sufficient time for the parties to continue to meet and confer regarding 13 ADR and reach a position to file the ADR Documents. There have been no previous time 14 modifications in the case. A two week extension of time will require that the parties file both the 15 ADR Documents and Case Management Statement on June 15, 2012 and will have no effect on 16 the schedule for the case. For the foregoing reasons, the parties hereby request that the Court 17 grant the instant request and extend the deadline to file the ADR Documents to June 15, 2012. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 1 DATED: June 1, 2012 Respectfully submitted, 2 KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP 3 By: /s/ Jessica L. Hannah 4 Jessica L. Hannah (State Bar No. 261802) 5 Attorneys for Defendants MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC. AND MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI By: /s/ Brian Range Attorneys for Defendant ARUBA NETWORKS, INC.; COOLEY LLP By: /s/ Justin Wilcox Attorneys for Defendant BROADSOFT, INC. WILEY REIN LLP By: /s/ Brian Pandya Attorneys for Defendant IP.ACCESS, INC. DUANE MORRIS LLP By: /s/ Matthew Yungwirth Attorneys for Defendant CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. ANDREWS KURTH LLP By: /s/ Gerald Conley Attorneys for Defendant MAVENIR SYSTEMS, INC. 27 28 3 1 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 2 By: /s/ Diana Luo 3 Attorneys for Defendant MERU NETWORKS, INC. 4 5 ANDREWS KURTH LLP 6 By: /s/ Robert A. Gutkin 7 Attorneys for Defendant SERCOMM CORPORATION 8 9 DUANE MORRIS LLP 10 By: /s/ Matthew Yungwirth 11 Attorneys for Defendant SONUS NETWORKS, INC. 12 13 K&L GATES LLP 14 By: /s/ Andrea B. Reed 15 Attorneys for Defendant SPRINT SPECTRUM, L.P. 16 17 BAKER BOTTS L.L.P. 18 By: /s/ Douglas Kubehl 19 Attorneys for Defendant STOKE, INC. 20 21 HENNIGAN BENNETT AND DORMAN 22 By: /s/ Lawrence M. Hadley 23 Attorneys for Defendant TATARA SYSTEMS, INC. 24 25 AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD 26 By: /s/ Kellie M. Johnson 27 Attorneys for Defendant HTC AMERICA, INC. 28 4 1 SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 2 By: /s/ Ashish Nagdev 3 Attorneys for Defendant UNITED STATES CELLULAR CORPORATION 4 5 WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI 6 By: /s/ Brian Range 7 Attorneys for Defendant KINETO WIRELESS, INC. 8 9 SIMPLSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP 10 By: /s/ Patrick King 11 Attorneys for Defendant AIRVANA, INC. 12 13 HOPKINS & CARLEY 14 By: /s/ Jennifer Coleman 15 Attorneys for Plaintiff EON CORP. IP HOLDINGS, LLC 16 17 18 19 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 27 S ER H 26 R NIA FO RT 25 NO 24 ERED By: __________________________ O ORD IT IS S Hon. Edward Chen United States District Court Judge Chen ard M. dge Edw Ju LI 23 June 6 Dated: ______________________, 2012 A 22 RT U O 21 S DISTRICT TE C TA UNIT ED 20 N F D IS T IC T O R C 28 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 SIGNATURE ATTESTATION Pursuant to general Order No. 45(X)(B), I hereby certify that I have obtained the concurrence in the filing of this document from all the signatories for whom a signature is indicated by a “conformed” signature (/s/) within this e-filed document and I have on file records to support this concurrence for subsequent production for the court if so ordered or for inspection 7 upon request. 8 DATED: 9 June 1, 2012 By: /s/ Jessica L. Hannah Jessica L. Hannah Attorneys for Defendants MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC. AND MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC. 10 11 12 13 3306848 v1 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 6

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?