EON Corp IP Holdings LLC v. Sensus USA Inc et al

Filing 365

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO FILE ADR CERTIFICATION AND STIPULATION TO ADR PROCESS. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/6/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/6/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP
STEVE MOORE (NC Bar No. . 23367)
CARL E. SANDERS (NC Bar No. 34190)
JAMES L. HOWARD (NC 39769)
1001 West Fourth Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27101-2400
Telephone: [phone]; Facsimile: 336 607 7500
E-mail: [e-mail]
E-mail: [e-mail]
E-mail: [e-mail]
KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP
JESSICA L. HANNAH (State Bar No. 261802)
Two Embarcadero Center, 8th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]; Facsimile: 415-576-0300
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants
MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC. AND MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC.

12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

13

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

15

EON CORP. IP HOLDINGS, LLC,
Plaintiff,

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

v.
SENSUS USA INC.; ARUBA NETWORKS,
INC.; BROADSOFT, INC.; CLAVISTER
AB; IP.ACCESS, INC.; JUNI AMERICA,
INC.; CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.; MAVENIR
SYSTEMS, INC.; MERU NETWORKS,
INC.; SERCOMM CORPORATION;
SONUS NETWORKS, INC.; SPRINT
SPECTRUM, L.P.; ADVANCED
METERING DATA SYSTEMS, LLC;
STOKE, INC.; TATARA SYSTEMS, INC.;
HTC AMERICA, INC.; PALM, INC.;
UNITED STATES CELLULAR
CORPORATION; CELLULAR SOUTH,
INC.; NTELOS, INC.; MOTOROLA
MOBILITY, INC.; MOTOROLA
SOLUTIONS, INC.; KINETO WIRELESS,
INC.; and AIRVANA, INC.,
Defendants.
Defendants.
AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS

Case No. C12-01011 EMC
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE ADR
CERTIFICATION AND STIPULATION
TO ADR PROCESS OR NOTICE OF
NEED FOR ADR TELEPHONE
CONFERENCE ; ORDER
[CIVIL L.R. 6-2]

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE ADR CERTIFICATION AND STIPULATION TO
ADR PROCESS OR NOTICE OF NEED FOR ADR TELEPHONE CONFERENCE
CASE NO. C12-01011 MEJ

1

Plaintiff EON Corp. IP Holdings, LLC and Defendants Aruba Networks, Inc., Broadsoft,

2

Inc., Cisco Systems, Inc., Mavenir Systems, Inc., Meru Networks, Inc., Sercomm Corporation,

3

Sonus Networks, Inc., Sprint Spectrum, L.P., Stoke, Inc., Tatara Systems, Inc., HTC America,

4

Inc., United States Cellular Corporation, Motorola Mobility, Inc., Motorola Solutions, Inc., Kineto

5

Wireless, Inc., and Airvana Inc. (“the parties”) hereby request an extension of time to file the ADR

6

Certification and a Stipulation to ADR Process or Notice of Need for ADR Telephone Conference

7

(“ADR Documents”) pursuant to Northern District Civil L. R. 16-8 and ADR L. R. 3-5.

8

All parties, with the exception of Clavister AB and Juni America, Inc., met and conferred

9

this morning regarding the Joint Case Management Conference Statement and the ADR programs

10

made available by this Court. While no agreement was reached between the parties this morning

11

with respect to ADR, the parties believe that an extension of two weeks to file the ADR

12

Documents will provide sufficient time for the parties to continue to meet and confer regarding

13

ADR and reach a position to file the ADR Documents. There have been no previous time

14

modifications in the case. A two week extension of time will require that the parties file both the

15

ADR Documents and Case Management Statement on June 15, 2012 and will have no effect on

16

the schedule for the case. For the foregoing reasons, the parties hereby request that the Court

17

grant the instant request and extend the deadline to file the ADR Documents to June 15, 2012.

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2

1

DATED: June 1, 2012

Respectfully submitted,

2

KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP

3

By: /s/ Jessica L. Hannah

4

Jessica L. Hannah (State Bar No. 261802)

5

Attorneys for Defendants
MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC. AND MOTOROLA
MOBILITY, INC.

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
By: /s/ Brian Range
Attorneys for Defendant
ARUBA NETWORKS, INC.;
COOLEY LLP
By: /s/ Justin Wilcox
Attorneys for Defendant
BROADSOFT, INC.
WILEY REIN LLP
By: /s/ Brian Pandya
Attorneys for Defendant
IP.ACCESS, INC.
DUANE MORRIS LLP
By: /s/ Matthew Yungwirth
Attorneys for Defendant
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
ANDREWS KURTH LLP
By: /s/ Gerald Conley
Attorneys for Defendant
MAVENIR SYSTEMS, INC.

27
28

3

1

MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

2

By: /s/ Diana Luo

3

Attorneys for Defendant
MERU NETWORKS, INC.

4
5

ANDREWS KURTH LLP

6

By: /s/ Robert A. Gutkin

7

Attorneys for Defendant
SERCOMM CORPORATION

8
9

DUANE MORRIS LLP

10

By: /s/ Matthew Yungwirth

11

Attorneys for Defendant
SONUS NETWORKS, INC.

12
13

K&L GATES LLP

14

By: /s/ Andrea B. Reed

15

Attorneys for Defendant
SPRINT SPECTRUM, L.P.

16
17

BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.

18

By: /s/ Douglas Kubehl

19

Attorneys for Defendant
STOKE, INC.

20
21

HENNIGAN BENNETT AND DORMAN

22

By: /s/ Lawrence M. Hadley

23

Attorneys for Defendant
TATARA SYSTEMS, INC.

24
25

AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD

26

By: /s/ Kellie M. Johnson

27

Attorneys for Defendant
HTC AMERICA, INC.

28

4

1

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP

2

By: /s/ Ashish Nagdev

3

Attorneys for Defendant
UNITED STATES CELLULAR CORPORATION

4
5

WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI

6

By: /s/ Brian Range

7

Attorneys for Defendant
KINETO WIRELESS, INC.

8
9

SIMPLSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP

10

By: /s/ Patrick King

11

Attorneys for Defendant
AIRVANA, INC.

12
13

HOPKINS & CARLEY

14

By: /s/ Jennifer Coleman

15

Attorneys for Plaintiff
EON CORP. IP HOLDINGS, LLC

16
17
18
19

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

27

S

ER

H

26

R NIA
FO

RT

25

NO

24

ERED

By: __________________________
O ORD
IT IS S
Hon. Edward Chen
United States District Court Judge
Chen
ard M.
dge Edw
Ju

LI

23

June 6
Dated: ______________________, 2012

A

22

RT
U
O

21

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

UNIT
ED

20

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

28

5

1
2
3
4
5
6

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION
Pursuant to general Order No. 45(X)(B), I hereby certify that I have obtained the
concurrence in the filing of this document from all the signatories for whom a signature is
indicated by a “conformed” signature (/s/) within this e-filed document and I have on file records
to support this concurrence for subsequent production for the court if so ordered or for inspection

7

upon request.

8

DATED:

9

June 1, 2012

By: /s/ Jessica L. Hannah
Jessica L. Hannah
Attorneys for Defendants
MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC. AND
MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC.

10
11
12
13

3306848 v1

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

6