EON Corp IP Holdings LLC v. Sensus USA Inc et al
Filing
413
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 389 for Extension of Time to File ADR Documents filed by Motorola Mobility, Inc.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/22/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/25/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP
STEVEN D. MOORE (admitted pro hac vice)
CARL E. SANDERS (admitted pro hac vice)
JAMES L. HOWARD (admitted pro hac vice)
1001 West Fourth Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27101-2400
Telephone: 336 607 7300
Facsimile: 336 607 7500
E-mail: smoore@kilpatricktownsend.com
E-mail: csanders@kilpatricktownsend.com
E-mail: jihoward@kilpatricktownsend.com
KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP
JESSICA L. HANNAH (State Bar No. 261802)
Two Embarcadero Center, 8th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: 415-576-0200
Facsimile: 415-576-0300
E-mail: jhannah@kilpatricktownsend.com
Attorneys for Defendant
MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
EON CORP. IP HOLDINGS, LLC,
Plaintiff,
v.
SENSUS USA INC., ET AL.,
Defendants.
AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS
Civil Action No. 3:12-cv-01011-EMC
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR AN
EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THE
ADR CERTIFICATION AND
STIPULATION TO ADR PROCESS OR
NOTICE OF NEED FOR ADR
TELEPHONE CONFERENCE l; ORDER
[CIVIL L.R. 6-2]
Judge:
Hon. Edward M. Chen
23
24
25
26
27
Plaintiff EON Corp. IP Holdings, LLC and Defendant Motorola Mobility, Inc. (“MMI”)
hereby request a ten day extension of time to file the ADR Certification and a Stipulation to ADR
Process or Notice of Need for ADR Telephone Conference (“ADR Documents”) pursuant to
Northern District Civil L. R. 16-8 and ADR L. R. 3-5.
28
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE ADR CERTIFICATION
AND STIP. TO ADR PROCESS OR NOTICE OF NEED FOR ADR TELEPHONE CONF.
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-01011-EMC
-1-
1
MMI was recently acquired by Google Inc. and is preparing an appropriate amended
2
disclosure statement to file with the Court. As a result of the acquisition, counsel for MMI requests
3
a ten-day extension of time to have the ADR Documents executed by an authorized signatory. The
4
deadline to file the ADR Documents was previously extended from June 1, 2012, to June 15, 2012.
5
Otherwise, there have been no previous time modifications in this case. A ten-day extension of
6
time will require that MMI file the ADR Documents on June 25, 2012 and will have no effect on
7
the schedule for the case. For the foregoing reasons, MMI hereby requests that the Court grant the
8
instant request and extend the deadline to file the ADR Documents to June 25, 2012.
9
10
DATED: June 15, 2012
Respectfully submitted,
11
KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP
12
By: /s/ Steven D. Moore
STEVEN D. MOORE (NC BAR NO. 23367)
13
14
Attorneys for Defendant
Motorola Mobility, Inc.
15
16
17
18
19
HOPKINS & CARLEY
By: /s/ Jennifer Coleman
JENNIFER COLEMAN
Attorneys for Plaintiff
EON CORP. IP HOLDINGS, LLC
20
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
ER
R NIA
n
M. Che
H
28
RT
27
dward
Judge E
NO
26
FO
25
By: __________________________
Hon. Edward RDERED
Chen
S States
United SO O District Court Judge
IT I
LI
24
June 22
Dated: ______________________, 2012
UNIT
ED
23
RT
U
O
S
22
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
A
21
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE ADR CERTIFICATION
AND STIP. TO ADR PROCESS OR NOTICE OF NEED FOR ADR TELEPHONE CONF.
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-01011-EMC
C
-2-
SIGNATURE ATTESTATION
1
2
3
4
5
6
Pursuant to general Order No. 45(X)(B), I hereby certify that I have obtained the
concurrence in the filing of this document from all the signatories for whom a signature is
indicated by a “conformed” signature (/s/) within this e-filed document and I have on file records
to support this concurrence for subsequent production for the court if so ordered or for inspection
upon request.
7
8
DATED:
9
June 15, 2012
By: /s/ Steven D. Moore
Steven D. Moore
Attorneys for Defendant
MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
3593233v.1
3593233v.1
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE ADR CERTIFICATION
AND STIP. TO ADR PROCESS OR NOTICE OF NEED FOR ADR TELEPHONE CONF.
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-01011-EMC
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?