EON Corp IP Holdings LLC v. Sensus USA Inc et al
Filing
419
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE PRIVATE ADR (between Plaintiff and Motorola Mobility). Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/28/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/28/2012)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
EON CORP. IP HOLDINGS,
LLC
,
Plaintiff(s),
CASE NO. ______________________
12-1011 EMC
v.
SENSUS USA INC., et al.
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
,
Defendant(s).
_______________________________/
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
9
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
9
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
9
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is
appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an
ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Private Process:
Private mediation with
✔
9
Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________
San Francisco JAMS or another mediator agreeable to all parties
_____________________________________________________________________________
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
9
the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order
referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. )
✔
9
Within 45 days of issuance of claim construction order
other requested deadline _____________________________________________
Dated:___________
6/25/2012
____________________________
/s/ John V. Picone III
Attorney for Plaintiff
Dated:____________
6/25/2012
____________________________
/s/ Steven D. Moore
Attorney for Defendant
Motorola Mobility, Inc.
CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE
[PROPOSED] ORDER
The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.
D
RDERE
OO
IT IS S
__________________________________
R NIA
June 28, 2012
UNIT
ED
Dated:
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
S
9x
9
A
H
ER
LI
RT
FO
NO
DISTRICT . C en
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATEhJUDGE
dward M
Judge E
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket
Event, e.g., “Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation.”
Rev. 12/11
Page 2 of 2
SIGNATURE ATTESTATION
Pursuant to general Order No. 45(X)(B), I hereby certify that I have obtained the
concurrence in the filing of this document from all the signatories for whom a signature is
indicated by a “conformed” signature (/s/) within this e-filed document and I have on file
records to support this concurrence for subsequent production for the court if so ordered or for
inspection upon request.
DATED:
June 25, 2012
By: /s/ Steven D. Moore
Steven D. Moore
Attorney for Defendant
MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?