EON Corp IP Holdings LLC v. Sensus USA Inc et al

Filing 419

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE PRIVATE ADR (between Plaintiff and Motorola Mobility). Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/28/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/28/2012)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EON CORP. IP HOLDINGS, LLC , Plaintiff(s), CASE NO. ______________________ 12-1011 EMC v. SENSUS USA INC., et al. STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS , Defendant(s). _______________________________/ Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Court Processes: 9 Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) 9 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) 9 Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) (Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) Private Process: Private mediation with ✔ 9 Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________ San Francisco JAMS or another mediator agreeable to all parties _____________________________________________________________________________ The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: 9 the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. ) ✔ 9 Within 45 days of issuance of claim construction order other requested deadline _____________________________________________ Dated:___________ 6/25/2012 ____________________________ /s/ John V. Picone III Attorney for Plaintiff Dated:____________ 6/25/2012 ____________________________ /s/ Steven D. Moore Attorney for Defendant Motorola Mobility, Inc. CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE [PROPOSED] ORDER The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED. The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED. D RDERE OO IT IS S __________________________________ R NIA June 28, 2012 UNIT ED Dated: S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O S 9x 9 A H ER LI RT FO NO DISTRICT . C en UNITED STATES MAGISTRATEhJUDGE dward M Judge E N F D IS T IC T O R C When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket Event, e.g., “Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation.” Rev. 12/11 Page 2 of 2 SIGNATURE ATTESTATION Pursuant to general Order No. 45(X)(B), I hereby certify that I have obtained the concurrence in the filing of this document from all the signatories for whom a signature is indicated by a “conformed” signature (/s/) within this e-filed document and I have on file records to support this concurrence for subsequent production for the court if so ordered or for inspection upon request. DATED: June 25, 2012 By: /s/ Steven D. Moore Steven D. Moore Attorney for Defendant MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?