EON Corp IP Holdings LLC v. Sensus USA Inc et al

Filing 704

STIPULATION AND ORDER re Stipulation for Extension of Time for EON to file Response to Sercomm's Notice of Motion and 665 MOTION to Compel Infringement Contentions; and For A Protective Order. Responses due by 5/13/2013. Replies due by 5/20/2013. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D Laporte on 5/6/2013. (knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/6/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

John V. Picone III, Bar No. 187226
[e-mail]
Jennifer S. Coleman, Bar No. 213210
[e-mail]
Christopher A. Hohn, Bar No. 271759
[e-mail]
HOPKINS & CARLEY
A Law Corporation
The Letitia Building
70 South First Street
San Jose, CA 95113-2406
mailing address:
P.O. Box 1469
San Jose, CA 95109-1469
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Daniel R. Scardino
Cabrach J. Connor
Chad Ennis
REED & SCARDINO LLP
301 Congress Avenue, Suite 1250
Austin, TX 78701
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
EON CORP. IP HOLDINGS, LLC

17
18

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

19

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

20

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

21

EON CORP. IP HOLDINGS, LLC,

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
H OPKINS & C ARLEY
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
SAN JO SE

Plaintiff,
v.
SPRINT SPECTRUM, L.P.; ARUBA
NETWORKS, INC.; BROADSOFT, INC.;
CLAVISTER AB; CISCO SYSTEMS,
INC.; MAVENIR SYSTEMS, INC.;
MERU NETWORKS, INC.; SERCOMM
CORPORATION; SONUS NETWORKS,
INC.; STOKE, INC.; TAQUA, LLC; HTC
AMERICA, INC.; UNITED STATES
CELLULAR CORPORATION;

CASE NO. 3:12-cv-01011-JST (EDL)
STIPULATED REQUEST AND PROPOSED
ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR
EON TO FILE A RESPONSE TO
SERCOMM’S NOTICE OF MOTION AND
MOTION TO:
1) COMPEL INFRINGEMENT
CONTENTIONS THAT COMPLY WITH
PATENT L.R. 3-1; AND
2) FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER TO STAY
OR LIMIT CERTAIN DISCOVERY

614\1001832.2
STIPULATED REQUEST AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONS 3:12-CV-01011-JST (EDL)

1
2

MOTOROLA MOBILITY HOLDINGS,
INC.; MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC.;
KINETO WIRELESS, INC.; and
AIRVANA, INC.,

3
Defendants.

Date:
Time:
Location:

June 4, 2013
9:00 AM
Courtroom E, 15th Floor

Discovery Matters Referred to United States
Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte

4
5

Plaintiff EON Corp. IP Holdings, LLC (“EON”) hereby requests and Defendant SerComm

6

Corporation (“SerComm”) agrees to a ten (10) day extension of time for EON to file a response to

7

SerComm’s Notice of Motion and Motion to:
1)

8
9

An Order compelling EON to provide infringement contentions that comply with

patent L.R. 3-1; and,

10

2)

A Protective Order to stay or limit certain discovery.

11

On April 8, 2013, EON filed a Motion for Extension of Time (Dkt. No. 674) for EON to

12

respond to SerComm’s Motion. On April 18, EON filed a Stipulated Request for Extension of

13

Time. (Dkt. No. 677). Since then, the parties reached a tentative agreement regarding the above

14

issues and expect to finalize the agreement in the next several days. Therefore, the motion will

15

likely be mooted prior to any necessary hearing. The requested extension for time will move the

16

Response due date to May 13, and the Reply due date to May 20, 2013. The motion is currently

17

set for hearing on June 4, 2013. The parties request that the hearing be continued. In the event

18

that the parties are unable to reach a resolution, the parties agree to reschedule a hearing date at

19

the Court’s earliest convenience.

20

///

21

///

22

///

23

///

24

///

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///

H OPKINS & C ARLEY
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
SAN JO SE

614\1001832.2

-2-

STIPULATED REQUEST AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONS 3:12-CV-01011-JST (EDL)

1

The extension will affect no other date or deadline in this case. For the foregoing reasons,

2

EON requests and SerComm does not oppose that the Court grant the request and extend the

3

deadline for EON to file its response to SerComm’s Motions.

4

Dated: May 2, 2013

5

HOPKINS & CARLEY
A Law Corporation

6
By: /s/ John V. Picone III
John V. Picone III
Attorneys for Plaintiff
EON CORP. IP HOLDINGS, LLC

7
8
9

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

ED

13

H

ER

LI

RT

15

FO

NO

14

R NIA

By: _____________________________
ORDER
IS SO Laporte
I Elizabeth
Hon.T
United States Magistrate Judge
e
. Laport
abeth D
liz
Judge E

May 6
Dated: ______________________, 2013

16
17

A

12

UNIT
ED

11

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

S

10

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
H OPKINS & C ARLEY
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
SAN JO SE

614\1001832.2

-3-

STIPULATED REQUEST AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONS 3:12-CV-01011-JST (EDL)