EON Corp IP Holdings LLC v. Sensus USA Inc et al

Filing 966

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 962 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Extend Time for Parties to Take Expert Depositions After Close of Expert Discovery filed by EON Corp IP Holdings LLC. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on February 26, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/26/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

John V. Picone III, Bar No. 187226
[e-mail]
Jennifer S. Coleman, Bar No. 213210
[e-mail]
Christopher A. Hohn, Bar No. 271759
[e-mail]
HOPKINS & CARLEY
A Law Corporation
The Letitia Building
70 South First Street
San Jose, CA 95113-2406
mailing address:
P.O. Box 1469
San Jose, CA 95109-1469
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Daniel R. Scardino
Chad Ennis
Nicholas Wyss
REED & SCARDINO LLP
301 Congress Avenue, Suite 1250
Austin, TX 78701
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
EON CORP. IP HOLDINGS, LLC

17
18

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

19

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

20

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

21

EON CORP. IP HOLDINGS, LLC,

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
H OPKINS & C ARLEY
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
SAN JO SE

Plaintiff,
v.
SPRINT SPECTRUM, L.P.; ARUBA
NETWORKS, INC.; BROADSOFT, INC.;
CLAVISTER AB; CISCO SYSTEMS,
INC.; MAVENIR SYSTEMS, INC.;
MERU NETWORKS, INC.; SERCOMM
CORPORATION; SONUS NETWORKS,
INC.; STOKE, INC.; TAQUA, LLC; HTC
AMERICA, INC.; UNITED STATES
CELLULAR CORPORATION;

CASE NO. 3:12-cv-01011-JST
STIPULATED REQUEST AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION
OF TIME PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL
RULE 6-2 FOR PARTIES TO TAKE
EXPERT DEPOSITIONS AFTER THE
CLOSE OF EXPERT DISCOVERY

692\1085353.2
STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-2 FOR PARTIES TO
TAKE EXPERT DEPOSITIONS AFTER THE CLOSE OF EXPERT DISCOVERY
3:12-CV-01011-JST

1
2

MOTOROLA MOBILITY HOLDINGS,
INC.; MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC.;
KINETO WIRELESS, INC.; and
AIRVANA, INC.,

3
Defendants.
4
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, Plaintiff EON Corp. IP Holdings, LLC (“EON” or

5
6

“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Sprint Spectrum, L.P. (“Sprint”), United States Cellular Corporation

7

(“U.S. Cellular”), Cisco Systems, Inc. (“Cisco”), Motorola Mobility, LLC (“Motorola”), and

8

HTC America, Inc. (“HTC”) (collectively “Defendants”) hereby stipulate to and request an

9

extension of time allowing them to conduct the following expert depositions after the close of

10

expert discovery on February 25, 20141:

11



EON’s deposition of Dr. Stephen B. Wicker;

12



EON’s deposition of Dr. W. Christopher Bakewell;

13



Defendants’ deposition of Dr. Jay P. Kesan;

14



EON’s deposition of Dr. Alan J. Cox;

15



EON’s deposition of Dr. Kevin J. Negus; and

16



Sprint, U.S. Cellular, Motorola, and HTC’s deposition of Dr. James J. Nawrocki.
Plaintiff and Defendants stipulate that these depositions will be completed by April 2,

17
18

2014. In order to facilitate these depositions, Plaintiff and Defendants further stipulate and

19

request that the Court extend the deadline to file discovery motions relating to the expert

20

depositions listed above until April 16, 2014. Currently, the deadline to file discovery motions

21

relating to expert discovery is scheduled for March 11, 2014, 14 days after the close of expert

22

discovery.2
This extension is necessary because the large number of parties and experts in this case

23
24

have made scheduling the expert depositions identified above prior to the close of expert

25

discovery exceedingly difficult. See Declaration of John V. Picone III in Support of this

26

Stipulation, filed concurrently herewith (“Picone Decl.”), at ¶ 3. The time modifications

27
1

28
H OPKINS & C ARLEY
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
SAN JO SE

2

See Scheduling Order, at page 2, line 14 (Dkt. No. 754).
Id. at page 2, lines 15-16.

-2692\1085353.2
STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-2 FOR PARTIES TO
TAKE EXPERT DEPOSITIONS AFTER THE CLOSE OF EXPERT DISCOVERY
3:12-CV-01011-JST

1

requested above should not affect any other scheduled event or deadline associated with this

2

matter. Id. at ¶ 4.

3

The following are the previous time modifications in this case:

4



5
6

Dkt. No. 206 filed March 16, 2011 – Motion for Extension of Time to File
Response/Reply as to Motion to Dismiss by Cellular South;



Dkt. No. 361 filed June 1, 2012 – Stipulated Request for Extension of Time to File

7

ADR Certification and Stipulation to ADR Process or Notice of Need for ADR

8

Telephone Conference;

9



Dkt. No. 389 filed June 15, 2012 – Stipulated Request for an Extension of Time to

10

File the ADR Certification and Stipulation to ADR Process or Notice of Need for

11

ADR Telephone Conference;

12



Dkt. No. 472 filed August 13, 2012 – Stipulated Request and Proposed Order for

13

Extension of Time for Motorola Solutions, Inc. to File Response to Second

14

Amended Complaint;

15



Dkt. No. 473 filed August 13, 2012 – Stipulated Request and Proposed Order for

16

Extension of Time for Motorola Mobility, Inc. to File Response to Second

17

Amended Complaint;

18



Extending the Parties’ Time to Serve Privilege Logs;

19
20

Dkt. No. 538 filed September 17, 2012 – Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order



Dkt. No. 577 filed November 13, 2012 – Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order

21

Extending the Parties’ Time to File Their Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing

22

Statement;

23



Dkt. No. 584 filed November 26, 2012 – Joint Stipulation and [Proposed] Order

24

Extending the Parties’ Time to File Damages Contentions and/or Scope of

25

Discovery Plan;

26



Dkt. No. 673 filed April 8, 2013 – Motion for Extension of Time for EON to File a

27

Response to SerComm’s Notice of Motion and Motion to Compel Infringement

28

Contentions that (1) Comply with Patent L.R. 3 1; and (2) For a Protective Order

H OPKINS & C ARLEY
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
SAN JO SE

-3692\1085353.2
STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-2 FOR PARTIES TO
TAKE EXPERT DEPOSITIONS AFTER THE CLOSE OF EXPERT DISCOVERY
3:12-CV-01011-JST

1
2

to Stay or Limit Certain Discovery;


Dkt. No. 677 filed April 18, 2013 – Stipulated Request and Proposed Order for

3

Extension of Time for EON to File a Response to SerComm’s Notice of Motion

4

and Motion to Compel Infringement Contentions that (1) Comply with Patent L.R.

5

3 1; and (2) For a Protective Order to Stay or Limit Certain Discovery;

6



7
8

Dkt. No. 682 filed April 22, 2013 – Joint Motion for Extension of Time to File
Supplemental Joint Case Management Statement;



Dkt. No. 703 filed May 2, 2013 – Stipulated Request and Proposed Order for
Extension of Time for EON to File a Response to SerComm’s Notice of Motion

9
10

and Motion to Compel Infringement Contentions that (1) Comply with Patent L.R.

11

3 1; and (2) For a Protective Order to Stay or Limit Certain Discovery;

12



13
14

Time to File a Joint or Competing Schedule (Dkt. No. 711);


15
16

Dkt. No. 726 filed June 7, 2013 – Stipulated Request and Order for Extension of

Dkt. No. 761 filed August 22, 2013 – Order Granting Stipulation (Dkt. No. 760) to
Extend ADR Deadline;



Dkt. No. 770 filed September 16, 2013 – Order Granting Motion for Extension of

17

Time, Terminating as Moot Motion to File Under Seal, and Granting Amended

18

Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; and

19



Dkt. No. 872 filed January 21, 2013 – Granting Stipulated Request and Proposed

20

Order for Extension of Time for Close of Fact Discovery and Expert Reports (Dkt.

21

No. 864).

22

Id. at ¶ 5.

23
24
25
26
27
28
H OPKINS & C ARLEY
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
SAN JO SE

-4692\1085353.2
STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-2 FOR PARTIES TO
TAKE EXPERT DEPOSITIONS AFTER THE CLOSE OF EXPERT DISCOVERY
3:12-CV-01011-JST

1

Dated: February 24, 2014

HOPKINS & CARLEY
A Law Corporation

2
3
4
5

By:/s/ John V. Picone III
John V. Picone III
Attorneys for Plaintiff
EON CORP. IP HOLDINGS, LLC

6
7

By: /s/ Eric Joseph Klein

8

Teresa Ghali (SBN 252961)
Email: [e-mail]
AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP
580 California Street, Suite 1500
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

Fred I Williams (admitted pro hac vice)
Email: [e-mail]
AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP
300 West 6th Street, Suite 1900
Austin, Texas 78701
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Todd Landis (admitted pro hac vice)
Email: [e-mail]
Kellie M. Johnson (admitted pro hac vice)
Email: [e-mail]
Eric Joseph Klein (admitted pro hac vice)
Email: [e-mail]
AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP
1700 Pacific Avenue, Suite 4100
Dallas, Texas 75201
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
HTC AMERICA, INC.

24
25
26
27
28
H OPKINS & C ARLEY
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
SAN JO SE

-5692\1085353.2
STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-2 FOR PARTIES TO
TAKE EXPERT DEPOSITIONS AFTER THE CLOSE OF EXPERT DISCOVERY
3:12-CV-01011-JST

1

By: /s/ Matthew S. Yungwirth

2

Matthew S. Yungwirth (admitted pro hac vice)
Email: [e-mail]
L. Norwood Jameson (admitted pro hac vice)
Email: [e-mail]
Alison M. Haddock (admitted pro hac vice)
Email: [e-mail]
David C. Dotson (admitted pro hac vice)
Email: [e-mail]
Stephanie A. Hansen (admitted pro hac vice)
Email: [e-mail]
DUANE MORRIS LLP
1075 Peachtree Street
Suite 2000
Atlanta, Georgia 30309
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

Richard L. Seabolt, Esq. (SBN 67469)
Email: [e-mail]
DUANE MORRIS LLP
One Market, Spear Tower, Suite 2000
San Francisco, CA 94105-1104
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.957.3001

14
15

Counsel for Defendant
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.

16
17

By: /s/ V. Raman Bharatula

18

Michael E. Zeliger (SBN 271118)
Email: [e-mail]
K&L GATES LLP
630 Hansen Way
Palo Alto, CA 94304
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

John J. Cotter (pro hac vice pending)
Email: [e-mail]
V. Raman Bharatula (admitted pro hac vice)
Email: [e-mail]
K&L GATES LLP
State Street Financial Center
One Lincoln Street
Boston, MA 02111-2950
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

27
28
H OPKINS & C ARLEY
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
SAN JO SE

Attorneys for Defendant
SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P.
-6692\1085353.2
STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-2 FOR PARTIES TO
TAKE EXPERT DEPOSITIONS AFTER THE CLOSE OF EXPERT DISCOVERY
3:12-CV-01011-JST

1
2

By: /s/ Carl E. Sanders

3

Steve Moore (NC Bar No. . 23367)
E-mail: [e-mail]
Carl E. Sanders (NC Bar No. 34190)
E-mail: [e-mail]
James L. Howard (NC Bar No. 39769)
E-mail: [e-mail]
KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP
1001 West Fourth Street
Winston-Salem, NC 27101-2400
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP
Jessica L. Hannah (State Bar No. 261802)
Two Embarcadero Center, 8th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415-576-0300
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant
MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC. and
MOTOROLA MOBILITY, LLC

15
16

By: /s/ Bryan K. Anderson

17

Richard J. O’Brien
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
One South Dearborn
Chicago, IL 60603
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Bryan K. Anderson
Ashish Nagdev
Email: [e-mail]
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
1001 Page Mill Road, Bldg. 1
Palo Alto, CA 94304
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Respondents
U.S. CELLULAR CORPORATION

26
27
28
H OPKINS & C ARLEY
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
SAN JO SE

-7692\1085353.2
STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-2 FOR PARTIES TO
TAKE EXPERT DEPOSITIONS AFTER THE CLOSE OF EXPERT DISCOVERY
3:12-CV-01011-JST

1
2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO L.R. 5-1(i)(3)
Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby certify that I have obtained concurrence in the

3

filing of this document from all the signatories for whom a signature is indicated by a

4

“conformed” signature (/s/) within this e-filed document. I have records to support this

5

concurrence. My office will maintain these records for inspection, if so requested, or for

6

production to the Court, if so ordered.

7

Executed on February 24, 2014, at San Jose, California.

8
/s/ John V. Picone III
John V. Picone III

9
10
11
12

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

13
14
15

Dated: February 26, 2014

By:
Honorable Jon S. Tigar
United States District Court Judge

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
H OPKINS & C ARLEY
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
SAN JO SE

692\1085353.2
STIPULATED REQUEST AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 6-2 FOR PARTIES TO
TAKE EXPERT DEPOSITIONS AFTER THE CLOSE OF EXPERT DISCOVERY
3:12-CV-01011-JST