Simpson v. Grounds et al
Filing
11
ORDER VACATING DISMISSAL ORDER AND REQUIRING AMENDED COMPLAINT. Amended Complaint due by 5/3/2013.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 3/22/13. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/22/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
CHAUNCEY R. SIMPSON,
9
Plaintiff,
v.
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
No. C 12-1024 EMC (pr)
R. GROUNDS, Warden; et al.,
12
ORDER VACATING DISMISSAL
ORDER AND REQUIRING AMENDED
COMPLAINT
Defendants.
___________________________________/
13
14
This pro se civil action was dismissed on August 1, 2012 because Plaintiff failed to pay the
15
filing fee or file the required in forma pauperis application by the July 16, 2012 deadline. The order
16
of dismissal crossed in the courthouse mail with a belated in forma pauperis application that
17
Plaintiff did file. In light of the fact that Plaintiff did file an in forma pauperis application (although
18
it was late) and in the interest of justice, the Court now VACATES the order of dismissal and
19
judgment.
20
Plaintiff's "motion for order for defendant(s) employing agency to process in forma pauperis
21
application" is DENIED as unnecessary. (Docket # 10.) By the time that motion was filed,
22
Plaintiff's in forma pauperis completed application already had been filed. The Court will rule on
23
the in forma pauperis application in a separate order.
24
At the time he submitted his belated in forma pauperis application, Plaintiff filed a form
25
complaint with the case number for this case written on the first page. (Docket # 9.) The Court
26
construes the document to be an amended complaint. The amended complaint directs the reader to
27
"see attached pages # 10-13" for the statement of his claim. See Docket # 9, p. 3. There are no
28
pages attached to the four-page form, however, so it fails to state a claim against any defendant. No
1
later than May 3, 2013, Plaintiff must file an amended complaint that contains a complete statement
2
of his claim(s) against the defendants. Plaintiff is cautioned that he must promptly comply with all
3
deadlines set by the Court.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 22, 2013
6
_________________________
EDWARD M. CHEN
United States District Judge
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
2
3
CHAUNCEY R SIMPSON,
4
Case Number: CV12-01024 EMC
Plaintiff,
5
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
v.
6
GROUNDS et al,
7
Defendant.
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
/
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District
Court, Northern District of California.
That on March 22, 2013, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said
copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said
envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle
located in the Clerk's office.
13
14
15
16
17
18
Chauncey Reene Simpson C-21848
Correctional Training Facility
P.O. Box 689
Soledad, CA 93960
Dated: March 22, 2013
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
By: Betty Lee, Deputy Clerk
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?