Rush v. Nutrex Research, Inc. et al

Filing 36

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE UNTIL JANUARY 31, 2013 - CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT DUE JANUARY 24, 2013. (lblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/27/2012)

Download PDF
Case3:12-cv-01060-LB Document35 Filed11/26/12 Page1 of 4 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 5567 RESEDA BOULEVARD, SUITE 330 POST OFFICE BOX 7033 TARZANA, CALIFORNIA 91357-7033 WASSERMAN, COMDEN, CASSELMAN & ESENSTEN, L.L.P. 1 ROBERT L. ESENSTEN, ESQ. (Bar No. 65728) resensten@wccelaw.com 2 GREGORY B. SCARLETT (Bar No. 131486) gscarlett@wccelaw.com 3 WASSERMAN, COMDEN, CASSELMAN & ESENSTEN, L.L.P. 5567 Reseda Boulevard, Suite 330 4 Post Office Box 7033 Tarzana, California 91357-7033 5 Telephone: (818) 705-6800 • (323) 872-0995 Facsimile: (818) 705-8927 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff, Stephen J. Rush, 7 individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 STEPHEN J. RUSH, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 Plaintiffs, 14 vs. 15 NUTREX RESEARCH, INC.; 16 JEFFREY A. MCCARRELL; JENS O. INGENOHL; and DOES 1-50, 17 inclusive, Defendants. 18 CASE NO. 2:12-cv-1060 LB CLASS ACTION STIPULATION TO CONTINUE FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER The Honorable Laurel Beeler Current Case Management Conf. Date Date: November 29, 2012 Time: 10:30 a.m. Crtrm.: C-15th Floor 19 20 21 22 Proposed Case Management Conf. Date Date: January 31, 2012 Time: 10:30 a.m. Place: C-15th Floor 23 24 25 26 27 28 1040943.1 2:12-cv-1060-LB Stipulation to Continue Further Case Management Conference Case3:12-cv-01060-LB Document35 Filed11/26/12 Page2 of 4 Pursuant to the Court’s July 12, 2012 Civil Minute Order (Dkt. #32), Plaintiff 1 2 Stephen J. Rush (“Plaintiff”) and defendants Nutrex Research, Inc. (“Nutrex”) and 3 Jens O. Ingenohl (collectively “Defendants”) (hereinafter collectively referred to as 4 the “Parties”) hereby submit the following Stipulation to Continue Further Case 5 Management Conference. 6 1. 7 WHEREAS, on or about October 19, 2012, Defendants served Plaintiff 9 Documents; 10 5567 RESEDA BOULEVARD, SUITE 330 POST OFFICE BOX 7033 TARZANA, CALIFORNIA 91357-7033 WASSERMAN, COMDEN, CASSELMAN & ESENSTEN, L.L.P. 8 with discovery, including Interrogatories and Requests for Production of 2. 11 WHEREAS, on or about October 22, 2012, Plaintiff served Defendants 12 with discovery, including Interrogatories and Requests for Production of 13 Documents; 14 3. 15 WHEREAS, both Parties’ discovery responses were originally due on 16 November 26, 2012; however, the Parties’ have provided each other with mutual 17 two-week extensions to serve their respective discovery responses, up to and 18 including December 3, 2012; 19 4. 20 WHEREAS, on or about November 16, 2012, the Parties agreed to 21 mediation before Retired Judge Jerry Spolter of JAMS with the mutual belief and 22 anticipation that mediation will hopefully result in a settlement and resolution of this 23 Action. The mediation is scheduled to take place on January 14, 2013; 24 5. 25 WHEREAS, the Court previously set a November 29, 2012 deadline to 26 complete mediation in this case. However, due to the need to complete certain 27 discovery prior to holding the mediation and due to potential conflicts in scheduling 28 and cross-country travel, the earliest available mediation date that is mutually 1040943.1 1 Stipulation to Continue Further Case Management Conference 2:12-cv-1060-LB Case3:12-cv-01060-LB Document35 Filed11/26/12 Page3 of 4 1 workable for the Parties is in January 2013; 2 6. 3 WHEREAS, the Parties seek to continue the Further Case Management 4 Conference in order to allow the Parties to fully exhaust private settlement 5 procedures before the Further Case Management Conference and eliminate the need 6 for the conference altogether, if the parties reach a settlement of the case; 7 7. WHEREAS, good cause exists to continue the Further Case 9 Management Conference in the interest of judicial economy and in order to 10 minimize costs and legal fees while providing the Parties with adequate time to 5567 RESEDA BOULEVARD, SUITE 330 POST OFFICE BOX 7033 TARZANA, CALIFORNIA 91357-7033 WASSERMAN, COMDEN, CASSELMAN & ESENSTEN, L.L.P. 8 11 complete certain discovery and mediation; 12 8. 13 WHEREAS, no prior requests to continue the deadline for the Further 14 Case Management Conference have been made; 15 9. 16 WHEREAS, no other court-imposed dates will be affected by the 17 continuance other than the date for filing a Joint Further Case Management 18 Conference Statement; 19 NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties, through their respective counsel of record, 20 21 hereby stipulate as follows: 22  23 The Further Case Management Conference shall be continued until 24 January 31, 2013 at 10:30 a.m. or the Court’s first available date 25 thereafter. 26  27 A Joint Further Case Management Conference Statement shall be due on January 28, 2013. 28 1040943.1 2 Stipulation to Continue Further Case Management Conference 2:12-cv-1060-LB Case3:12-cv-01060-LB Document35 Filed11/26/12 Page4 of 4 1 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 2 3 DATED: November 26, 2012 4 WASSERMAN, COMDEN, CASSELMAN & ESENSTEN, L.L.P. GREGORY B. SCARLETT 5 By: /s/ Gregory B. Scarlett GREGORY B. SCARLETT Attorneys for Plaintiff, Stephen J. Rush, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated 6 7 9 10 5567 RESEDA BOULEVARD, SUITE 330 POST OFFICE BOX 7033 TARZANA, CALIFORNIA 91357-7033 WASSERMAN, COMDEN, CASSELMAN & ESENSTEN, L.L.P. 8 11 DATED: November 26, 2012 12 REED SMITH LLP ROBERT D. PHILLIPS, JR. KATHY J. HUANG 13 14 By: /s/ Kathy J. Huang KATHY J. HUANG Attorneys for Defendants Nutrex Research, Inc. and Jens O. Ingenohl 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1040943.1 3 Stipulation to Continue Further Case Management Conference 2:12-cv-1060-LB Case3:12-cv-01060-LB Document35-1 Filed11/26/12 Page1 of 2 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 5567 RESEDA BOULEVARD, SUITE 330 POST OFFICE BOX 7033 TARZANA, CALIFORNIA 91357-7033 WASSERMAN, COMDEN, CASSELMAN & ESENSTEN, L.L.P. 1 ROBERT L. ESENSTEN, ESQ. (Bar No. 65728) resensten@wccelaw.com 2 GREGORY B. SCARLETT (Bar No. 131486) gscarlett@wccelaw.com 3 WASSERMAN, COMDEN, CASSELMAN & ESENSTEN, L.L.P. 5567 Reseda Boulevard, Suite 330 4 Post Office Box 7033 Tarzana, California 91357-7033 5 Telephone: (818) 705-6800 • (323) 872-0995 Facsimile: (818) 705-8927 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff, Stephen J. Rush, 7 individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 CASE NO. 2:12-cv-1060 LB 12 STEPHEN J. RUSH, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 Plaintiffs, 14 vs. 15 NUTREX RESEARCH, INC.; 16 JEFFREY A. MCCARRELL; JENS O. INGENOHL; and DOES 1-50, 17 inclusive, CLASS ACTION [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING NOVEMBER 29, 2012 FURTHER CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Defendants. 18 19 20 After consideration of the Stipulation submitted by the parties in the above- 21 entitled action to continue the Further Case Management Conference currently 22 scheduled for November 29, 2012, at 10:30 a.m., and good cause appearing therefor, 23 the Court orders as follows: 24 25 1. The Further Case Management Conference shall be continued until 26 January 31, 2013 at 10:30 a.m.; and 27 28 2. 1040789.1 A Joint Further Case Management Conference Statement shall be due 1 [Proposed] Order Continuing Further Case Management Conference 2:12-cv-1060-LB Case3:12-cv-01060-LB Document35-1 Filed11/26/12 Page2 of 2 1 on January 28, 2013.January 24, 2013. 2 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 DATED: November 27, , 2012 5 6 Honorable Laurel Beeler United States Magistrate Judge 7 9 10 5567 RESEDA BOULEVARD, SUITE 330 POST OFFICE BOX 7033 TARZANA, CALIFORNIA 91357-7033 WASSERMAN, COMDEN, CASSELMAN & ESENSTEN, L.L.P. 8 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1040789.1 2 [Proposed] Order Continuing Further Case Management Conference 2:12-cv-1060-LB

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?