Roland v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc et al

Filing 54

ORDER SCHEDULING TRIAL AND PRETRIAL MATTERS. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 6/11/12. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/11/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 Roland, 6 7 8 No. CV12-01061 JSW Plaintiff, v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc, 9 Defendant. 10 / 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court ORDER SCHEDULING TRIAL AND PRETRIAL MATTERS 12 Following the Case Management Conference, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Case 13 Management Statement is adopted, except as expressly modified by this Order. It is further 14 ORDERED that: 15 A. DATES 16 Jury Trial Date: 10/7/2013, at 8:00 a.m., 3 days 17 Pretrial Conference: Monday, 9/16/2013, at 2:00 p.m. 18 Last Day to Hear Dispositive Motions: Friday, 6/28/2013, 9:00 a.m. 19 Close of ALL Discovery: 3/25/2013 20 B. DISCOVERY 21 The parties are reminded that a failure voluntarily to disclose information pursuant to 22 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a) or to supplement disclosures or discovery responses 23 pursuant to Rule 26(e) may result in exclusionary sanctions. Thirty days prior to the close of 24 non-expert discovery, lead counsel for each party shall serve and file a certification that all 25 supplementation has been completed. 26 C. ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION 27 This matter is referred to court-connected mediation, to be conducted by October 1, 28 2012. The parties shall promptly notify the Court whether the case is resolved at the mediation. 1 D. PROCEDURE FOR AMENDING THIS ORDER 2 No provision of this order may be changed except by written order of this court upon its 3 own motion or upon motion of one or more parties made pursuant to Civil. L. R. 7-1 or 7-1-(b) 4 without a showing of very good cause. If the modification sought is an extension of a deadline 5 contained herein, the motion must be brought before expiration of that deadline. The parties 6 may not modify the pretrial schedule by stipulation. A conflict with a court date set after the 7 date of this order does not constitute good cause. The parties are advised that if they stipulate to 8 a change in the discovery schedule, they do so at their own risk. The only discovery schedule 9 that the Court will enforce is the one set in this order. Additionally, briefing schedules that are specifically set by the court may not be altered by stipulation; rather the parties must obtain 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 leave of Court. 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. 13 Dated: June 11, 2012 14 JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?