Network Protection Sciences, LLC v. Juniper Networks, Inc. et al
Filing
211
ORDER DENYING PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY ANDREW MACARTHUR by Judge Alsup denying 208 Motion for Pro Hac Vice; denying 210 Motion for Pro Hac Vice (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/21/2013)
1
2
3
4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
8
9
Plaintiff,
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
11
12
No. C 12-01106 WHA
NETWORK PROTECTION SCIENCES,
LLC,
ORDER DENYING PRO HAC
VICE APPLICATION OF
ATTORNEY ANDREW
MACARTHUR
v.
FORTINET, INC.,
Defendant.
13
/
14
15
Attorney Andrew MacArthur, an associate working under the supervision of lead
16
attorney pro hac vice Michael Cukor, moves for admission pro hac vice (Dkt. Nos. 208, 210).
17
Defendant objects, and plaintiff admits, that Attorney MacArthur appeared in three depositions
18
in this action prior to filing his application. Attorney MacArthur, Attorney Cukor, and local
19
counsel Jill Kopeikin have submitted sworn declarations apologizing to the Court and stating
20
that Attorney MacArthur’s failure to timely seek admission was inadvertent (Dkt. Nos. 210-
21
1–210-3).
22
Attorney MacArthur’s conduct violated Local Rules 11-1 and 11-3. Nevertheless, on the
23
present record, Attorney MacArthur’s conduct does not rise to a level that warrants a referral to
24
the standing committee or other sanction under Local Rule 11-8. Attorney MacArthur’s pro hac
25
vice application, however, shall be DENIED.
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 21, 2013.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?