Network Protection Sciences, LLC v. Juniper Networks, Inc. et al

Filing 211

ORDER DENYING PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY ANDREW MACARTHUR by Judge Alsup denying 208 Motion for Pro Hac Vice; denying 210 Motion for Pro Hac Vice (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/21/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 8 9 Plaintiff, For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 11 12 No. C 12-01106 WHA NETWORK PROTECTION SCIENCES, LLC, ORDER DENYING PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY ANDREW MACARTHUR v. FORTINET, INC., Defendant. 13 / 14 15 Attorney Andrew MacArthur, an associate working under the supervision of lead 16 attorney pro hac vice Michael Cukor, moves for admission pro hac vice (Dkt. Nos. 208, 210). 17 Defendant objects, and plaintiff admits, that Attorney MacArthur appeared in three depositions 18 in this action prior to filing his application. Attorney MacArthur, Attorney Cukor, and local 19 counsel Jill Kopeikin have submitted sworn declarations apologizing to the Court and stating 20 that Attorney MacArthur’s failure to timely seek admission was inadvertent (Dkt. Nos. 210- 21 1–210-3). 22 Attorney MacArthur’s conduct violated Local Rules 11-1 and 11-3. Nevertheless, on the 23 present record, Attorney MacArthur’s conduct does not rise to a level that warrants a referral to 24 the standing committee or other sanction under Local Rule 11-8. Attorney MacArthur’s pro hac 25 vice application, however, shall be DENIED. 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 21, 2013. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?