Network Protection Sciences, LLC v. Juniper Networks, Inc. et al

Filing 225

ORDER DENYING PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY JILLIAN CENTANNI by Hon. William Alsup denying 217 Motion for Pro Hac Vice.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/26/2013)

1
2
3
4
5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9

12
13
14

No. C 12-1106 WHA

Plaintiff,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

NETWORK PROTECTION SCIENCES,
LLC,

ORDER DENYING PRO HAC
VICE APPLICATION OF
ATTORNEY JILLIAN CENTANNI

v.
FORTINET, INC.,
Defendant.
/

15
16

The pro hac vice application of Attorney Jillian Centanni (Dkt. No. 217) is DENIED for

17

failing to comply with Local Rule 11-3. The local rule requires that an applicant certify that “he

18

or she is an active member in good standing of the bar of a United States Court or of the highest

19

court of another State or the District of Columbia, specifying such bar” (emphasis added).

20

Filling out the pro hac vice form from the district court website such that it only identifies the

21

state of bar membership is inadequate under the local rule because it fails to identify a specific

22

court. While the application fee does not need to be paid again, the application cannot be

23

processed until a corrected form is submitted.

24
25

IT IS SO ORDERED.

26
27
28

Dated: July 25, 2013.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE