Network Protection Sciences, LLC v. Juniper Networks, Inc. et al
Filing
232
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO SEAL by Hon. William Alsup granting 231 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/5/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11
12
13 NETWORK PROTECTION SCIENCES,
LLC,
14
Plaintiff,
15
vs.
16
FORTINET, INC.,
17
Defendant.
18
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-01106-WHA
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
FORTINET, INC.’S ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS
UNDER SEAL IN SUPPORT OF
FORTINET, INC.’S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
04880.52079/5447688.1
Case No. 3:12-CV-01106-WHA
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FORTINET INC.’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL
1
2
PROPOSED ORDER
Before the Court is Defendant Fortinet, Inc.’s (“Fortinet”) Administrative Motion
3 to File Documents Under Seal in Support of Fortinet, Inc.’s Motion For Summary Judgment,
4 requesting that Exhibits 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, and 12 to the Declaration of Andrew M. Holmes in support
5 of Fortinet’s Motion for Summary Judgment be filed under seal.
6
After considering Fortinet’s motion and supporting evidence, and it appearing to
7 the Court that good cause exists for the granting of the motion, Fortinet’s motion is hereby
8 GRANTED.
9
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the following documents, which have been
10 lodged with this Court, be filed under seal:
11
1.
12
13
Motion for Summary Judgment;
2.
14
15
3.
4.
22
Exhibit 5 to the Declaration of Andrew M. Holmes in support of Fortinet’s
Motion for Summary Judgment;
5.
20
21
Exhibit 4 to the Declaration of Andrew M. Holmes in support of Fortinet’s
Motion for Summary Judgment;
18
19
Exhibit 3 to the Declaration of Andrew M. Holmes in support of Fortinet’s
Motion for Summary Judgment;
16
17
Exhibit 2 to the Declaration of Andrew M. Holmes in support of Fortinet’s
Exhibit 10 to the Declaration of Andrew M. Holmes in support of
Fortinet’s Motion for Summary Judgment; and
6.
Exhibit 12 to the Declaration of Andrew M. Holmes in support of
Fortinet’s Motion for Summary Judgment.
23
24 IT IS SO ORDERED.
25 Dated: August 5, 2013.
____________________________________
26
Hon. William H. Alsup
27
United States District Court Judge
28
04880.52079/5447688.1
Case No. 3:12-CV-01106-WHA
-2[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FORTINET INC.’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?