Network Protection Sciences, LLC v. Juniper Networks, Inc. et al

Filing 232

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO SEAL by Hon. William Alsup granting 231 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/5/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 12 13 NETWORK PROTECTION SCIENCES, LLC, 14 Plaintiff, 15 vs. 16 FORTINET, INC., 17 Defendant. 18 CASE NO. 3:12-CV-01106-WHA [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FORTINET, INC.’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL IN SUPPORT OF FORTINET, INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 04880.52079/5447688.1 Case No. 3:12-CV-01106-WHA [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FORTINET INC.’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL 1 2 PROPOSED ORDER Before the Court is Defendant Fortinet, Inc.’s (“Fortinet”) Administrative Motion 3 to File Documents Under Seal in Support of Fortinet, Inc.’s Motion For Summary Judgment, 4 requesting that Exhibits 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, and 12 to the Declaration of Andrew M. Holmes in support 5 of Fortinet’s Motion for Summary Judgment be filed under seal. 6 After considering Fortinet’s motion and supporting evidence, and it appearing to 7 the Court that good cause exists for the granting of the motion, Fortinet’s motion is hereby 8 GRANTED. 9 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the following documents, which have been 10 lodged with this Court, be filed under seal: 11 1. 12 13 Motion for Summary Judgment; 2. 14 15 3. 4. 22 Exhibit 5 to the Declaration of Andrew M. Holmes in support of Fortinet’s Motion for Summary Judgment; 5. 20 21 Exhibit 4 to the Declaration of Andrew M. Holmes in support of Fortinet’s Motion for Summary Judgment; 18 19 Exhibit 3 to the Declaration of Andrew M. Holmes in support of Fortinet’s Motion for Summary Judgment; 16 17 Exhibit 2 to the Declaration of Andrew M. Holmes in support of Fortinet’s Exhibit 10 to the Declaration of Andrew M. Holmes in support of Fortinet’s Motion for Summary Judgment; and 6. Exhibit 12 to the Declaration of Andrew M. Holmes in support of Fortinet’s Motion for Summary Judgment. 23 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 Dated: August 5, 2013. ____________________________________ 26 Hon. William H. Alsup 27 United States District Court Judge 28 04880.52079/5447688.1 Case No. 3:12-CV-01106-WHA -2[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FORTINET INC.’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?