Network Protection Sciences, LLC v. Juniper Networks, Inc. et al

Filing 257

ORDER CONTINUING HEARING by Hon. William Alsup granting 247 Stipulation.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/23/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

MICHAEL CUKOR (NY Bar No. 3935889)
GIBBONS P.C.
One Pennsylvania Plaza, 37th Floor
New York, New York 10119-3701
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
VINCENT E. MCGEARY (NJ Bar No. 041681991)
GIBBONS P.C.
One Gateway Center
Newark, NJ 07102-5310
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
JILL F. KOPEIKIN (CA Bar No. 160792)
VALERIE M. WAGNER (CA Bar No. 173146)
GCA LAW PARTNERS LLP
2570 W. El Camino Real, Suite 500
Mountain View, CA 94040
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

14
15

Attorneys for Plaintiff
Network Protection Sciences, LLC

16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

17
18
19
20

NETWORK PROTECTION SCIENCES,
LLC

21
Plaintiff,
22
23

vs.

24

FORTINET, INC.

25
26

Defendants.

No. 3:12-CV-01106-WHA
[PROPOSED ORDER] ON
STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE
OF SEPTEMBER 5, 2013 HEARING
ON FORTINET, INC’S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT FOR NONINFRINGEMENT
Date: September 5, 2013
Time: 8:00 a.m.
Judge: William H. Alsup

27
28

GCA Law Partners LLP
2570 W. El Camino Real, Suite 500
Mountain View, CA 94040
[phone]

[Proposed] Order Re: Stipulation for Continuance of September 5, 1013 Hearing on Fortinet, Inc’s Motion
for Summary Judgment for Non-Infringement; CASE NO. 3:12-CV-01106-WHA

1

The Parties’ Stipulation for Continuance of September 5, 2013, on Defendant Fortinet,

2

Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment for Non-Infringement, made pursuant to Local Rules 6-

3

1(b) and 6-2, came before this Court.

4

The Court having considered the Parties’ Stipulation, and finding good cause

5

therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the hearing on Defendant Fortinet, Inc.’s

6

Motion for Summary Judgment for Non-Infringement shall be continued from September 5,

7

September 26 at 8:00 2013.
2013, at 8:00 a.m. to ___________________,a.m.

8

All other dates shall remain the same.

9

IT IS SO ORDERED.

10
11
12
13
14

23
Dated: August ___, 2013

By:______________________________
The Honorable William H. Alsup
District Court Judge
Northern District of California.

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

GCA Law Partners LLP
2570 W. El Camino Real, Suite 500
Mountain View, CA 94040
[phone]

[Proposed] Order Re: Stipulation for Continuance of September 5, 1013 Hearing on Fortinet, Inc’s Motion
for Summary Judgment for Non-Infringement; CASE NO. 3:12-CV-01106-WHA

1