Network Protection Sciences, LLC v. Juniper Networks, Inc. et al

Filing 268

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO SEAL DOCUMENTS IN SUPPORT OF SUMMARY JUDGMENT REPLY (DKT. NO. 253) by Hon. William Alsup granting 253 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/12/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

11
12
13 NETWORK PROTECTION SCIENCES,
LLC,
14
Plaintiff,
15
vs.
16
FORTINET, INC.,
17
Defendant.
18

CASE NO. 3:12-CV-01106-WHA
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
FORTINET, INC.’S ADMINISTRATIVE
MOTION TO FILE DOCUMENTS
UNDER SEAL IN SUPPORT OF
FORTINET, INC.’S REPLY IN SUPPORT
OF ITS MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
04880.52079/5483881.1

Case No. 3:12-CV-01106-WHA
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FORTINET INC.’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL

1
2

PROPOSED ORDER
Before the Court is Defendant Fortinet, Inc.’s (“Fortinet”) Administrative Motion

3 to File Documents Under Seal in Support of Fortinet, Inc.’s Reply in support of its Motion for
4 Summary Judgment, requesting that Exhibit 14 to the Reply Declaration of John M. Neukom in
5 support of Fortinet’s Reply in support of its Motion for Summary Judgment be filed under seal.
6

After considering Fortinet’s motion and supporting evidence, and it appearing to

7 the Court that good cause exists for the granting of the motion, Fortinet’s motion is hereby
8 GRANTED.
9

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the following document, which has been

10 lodged with this Court, be filed under seal:
11

Exhibit 14 to the Reply Declaration of John M. Neukom in support of Fortinet’s

12 Reply in support of its Motion for Summary Judgment.
13
14
15 IT IS SO ORDERED.
16 Dated: September 12, 2013.
17

Hon. William H. Alsup
United States District Court Judge

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
04880.52079/5483881.1

Case No. 3:12-CV-01106-WHA
-2[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FORTINET INC.’S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO SEAL