Network Protection Sciences, LLC v. Juniper Networks, Inc. et al

Filing 328

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SEAL (DKT. NO. 272) by Hon. William Alsup denying 272 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/24/2013)

1
2
3
4

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
8
9

Plaintiff,

For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10
11
12
13

No. C 12-01106 WHA

NETWORK PROTECTION SCIENCES,
LLC,

ORDER DENYING
MOTION TO SEAL
(DKT. NO. 272)

v.
FORTINET, INC.,
Defendant.
/

14
15

On September 12, defendant Fortinet filed a motion to seal portions of its reply in support

16

of its motion to strike the testimony of Dr. Keromytis (Dkt. No. 272). Most of the redactions

17

appear to be overbroad and improper. For example, on page 3 of the reply brief Fortinet has

18

redacted deposition excerpts wherein a witness states that he would require “source code to

19

definitively describe the product and its operation.” The motion to seal is accordingly DENIED.

20

Fortinet shall refile the reply brief for on the public docket by SEPTEMBER 25 AT NOON.

21
22

IT IS SO ORDERED.

23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated: September 24, 2013.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE