Khan v. ReconTrust Company et al

Filing 157

ORDER EXTENDING THE BRIEFING DEADLINES AND THE HEARING DATE FOR DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT. See order for details. Set/Reset Deadlines as to 152 MOTION for Summary Judgment . Responses due by 6/8/2015. Replies due by 6/15/2015. Motion Hearing set for 6/25/2015 09:30 AM in Courtroom C, 15th Floor, San Francisco before Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on 5/27/2015. (lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/27/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 Northern District of California 10 San Francisco Division RAHILA KHAN, 12 For the Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 13 14 No. 3:12-cv-01107 LB Plaintiff, v. RECONTRUST COMPANY, et al. 15 Defendants. ORDER EXTENDING THE BRIEFING DEADLINES AND THE HEARING DATE FOR DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [Re: ECF No. 155] 16 17 _____________________________________/ 18 Bank of America filed a motion for summary judgment on May 12, 2015. (Motion, ECF No. 19 152.) Ms. Khan, who is proceeding pro se but nevertheless is an e-filer on the court’s ECF system, 20 was served with the motion via ECF notification on that same day. This means that the deadline for 21 her to file an opposition to Bank of America’s motion was May 26, 2015. N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 7-3(a). 22 On that day, instead of filing an opposition, Ms. Khan filed a letter asking for more time because she 23 never received a hard copy of the motion and exhibits from Bank of America. (Letter, ECF No. 155.) 24 Correspondence between Ms. Khan and Bank of America, however, shows that Bank of America’s 25 counsel sent Ms. Khan, as a courtesy, PDF files of the documents and also printed the documents for 26 her to pick up at Bank of America’s counsel’s office, per Ms. Khan’s request. (See Wittemore Decl., 27 Exs. A-F, ECF No. 156.) She never picked them up. (Id. ¶ 10.) 28 Regardless, the issue now is what to do about the briefing on and hearing date for Bank of No. 3:12-cv-01107 LB ORDER 1 America’s pending summary judgment motion. Given her pro se status and good faith efforts during 2 this litigation, the court will give her until Monday, June 8, 2015 to file an opposition to Bank of 3 America’s motion for summary judgment. The court asks that Bank of America mail Ms. Khan a 4 hard copy of its motion and accompanying documents. Ms. Khan may either arrange to pick up the 5 hard copy documents that apparently are still waiting for her at Bank of America’s counsel’s office 6 or wait to receive them in the mail, but in either case her opposition must be filed by June 8, 2015. 7 Bank of America may file any reply by June 15, 2015. The court also continues the hearing on the 8 motion from June 18, 2015 to June 25, 2015 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom C, 15th Floor, United States 9 District Court, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California 94102. 10 It also appears that Bank of America never sent chambers copies of its motion and accompanying documents to the court. The court orders Bank of America to deliver chambers copies 12 For the Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 to the court no later than 12:00 p.m. on Thursday, May 28, 2015. 13 14 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 27, 2015 _______________________________ LAUREL BEELER United States Magistrate Judge 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 No. 3:12-cv-01107 LB ORDER 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?