Steinfeld v. Discover Financial Services et al

Filing 29

ORDER GRANTING 28 STIPULATION To Continue Deadline For Defendants To Respond To Complaint from October 11, 2012 To December 11, 2012 And Initial Case Management Conference From November 16, 2012 To January 18, 2013. Case Management Statement due by 1/11/2013. Initial Case Management Conference set for 1/18/2013 01:30 PM in Courtroom 11, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 10/15/12. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/15/2012)

Download PDF
Case3:12-cv-01118-JSW Document28 Filed10/11/12 Page1 of 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 STROOCK & STROOCK & LAVAN LLP JULIA B. STRICKLAND (State Bar No. 83013) LISA M. SIMONETTI (State Bar No. 165996) SHANNON E. PONEK (State Bar No. 261135) 2029 Century Park East, Suite 1600 Los Angeles, California 90067-3086 Telephone: 310-556-5800 Facsimile: 310-556-5959 Email: lacalendar@stroock.com Attorneys for Defendants DISCOVER FINANCIAL SERVICES, DFS SERVICES LLC and DISCOVER BANK 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 ANDREW STEINFELD, on behalf of himself ) and all others similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) DISCOVER FINANCIAL SERVICES, DFS ) SERVICES LLC, and DISCOVER BANK, ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 3:12-cv-01118-JSW [Assigned to the Hon. Jeffrey S. White] STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT FROM OCTOBER 11, 2012 TO DECEMBER 11, 2012 AND INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FROM NOVEMBER 16, 2012 TO JANUARY 18, 2013 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Case No. 3:12-cv-01118-JSW LA 51591922v1 Case3:12-cv-01118-JSW Document28 Filed10/11/12 Page2 of 5 1 Plaintiff Andrew Steinfeld and Defendants Discover Financial Services, DFS Financial 2 Services, LLC, and Discover Bank (collectively, “Defendants”), through their undersigned counsel, 3 hereby stipulate as follows: 4 WHEREAS, Plaintiff Steinfeld filed his Class Action Complaint for Damages and 5 Injunctive Relief Pursuant to 47 U.S.C. § 227, et seq. (Telephone Consumer Protection Act) on 6 March 6, 2012; 7 WHEREAS, pursuant to Stipulation and Order so that the parties could attend mediation before the Honorable Carl West (Ret.) of JAMS, the Court set August 16, 2012, as the last day for 9 Defendants to file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil 10 2029 Century Park East Los Angeles, California 90067-3086 STROOCK & STROOCK & LAVAN LLP 8 11 12 13 Procedure (Dkt. No. 19); WHEREAS, the Court set an Initial Case Management Conference for September 21, 2012, at 1:30 p.m. (Dkt. No. 19); WHEREAS, the parties had constructive sessions on May 31, 2012, and July 10, 2012, and 14 follow-up teleconferences with Judge West on July 24, 2012, and August 6, 2012, but were not 15 able to finally resolve the matter; 16 17 18 WHEREAS, the parties scheduled a mediation with Judge West for September 27, 2012 to continue discussions; WHEREAS, on August 21, 2012, the Court entered the parties Stipulation and [Proposed] 19 Order Regarding Case Schedule and continued the deadline for Defendants to file and serve an 20 answer or a motion under Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to October 11, 2012 and 21 postponed the Initial Case Management Conference until November 16, 2012 (Dkt. No. 20); 22 23 24 25 WHEREAS, the parties had a constructive mediation session on September 27, 2012, but were not able to finally resolve the matter; and WHEREAS, the parties seek to continue the deadline for Defendants to file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and postpone the Initial 26 27 -1- 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Case No. 3:12-cv-01118-JSW LA 51591922v1 Case3:12-cv-01118-JSW Document28 Filed10/11/12 Page3 of 5 1 Case Management Conference so that they may devote the time to matters that will advance the 2 parties’ ability to finally resolve the matter. 3 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, between Plaintiff 4 Steinfeld, by his undersigned counsel, and Defendants, by their undersigned counsel, that the last 5 day for Defendants to file and serve an answer or a motion under Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of 6 Civil Procedure shall be continued from October 11, 2012 to December 11, 2012. The Initial Case 7 Management Conference shall be postponed until January 18, 2013 at 1:30 p.m. 8 Dated: October 11, 2012 10 2029 Century Park East Los Angeles, California 90067-3086 STROOCK & STROOCK & LAVAN LLP 9 IT IS SO STIPULATED. STROOCK & STROOCK & LAVAN LLP By: 11 Julia B. Strickland jstrickland@stroock.com Lisa M. Simonetti lsimonetti@stroock.com Shannon E. Ponek sponek@stroock.com STROOCK & STROOCK & LAVAN LLP 2029 Century Park East, Suite 1600 Los Angeles, CA 90067-3086 Telephone: 310-556-5800 Facsimile: 310-556-5959 12 13 14 15 16 17 Attorneys for Defendants Discover Financial Services, DFS Services LLC And Discover Bank 18 19 /s/ Lisa M. Simonetti Lisa M. Simonetti Dated: October 11, 2012 20 LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP By: 21 /s/ Daniel M. Hutchinson Daniel M. Hutchinson Daniel M. Hutchinson dhutchinson@lchb.com Kristen Law Sagafi ksagafi@lchb.com 275 Battery Street, 29th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-3339 Telephone: 415-956-1000 Facsimile: 415-956-1008 22 23 24 25 26 [continued on next page] 27 -2- 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Case No. 3:12-cv-01118-JSW LA 51591922v1 Case3:12-cv-01118-JSW Document28 Filed10/11/12 Page4 of 5 1 LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP Jonathan D. Selbin jselbin@lchb.com 250 Hudson Street, 8th Floor New York, NY 10013 Telephone: 212-355-9500 Facsimile: 212-355-9592 2 3 4 5 MEYER WILSON CO., LPA David P. Meyer (pro hac vice application to be filed) Matthew R. Wilson (admitted pro hac vice) mwilson@meyerwilson.com 1320 Dublin Road, Suite 100 Columbus, OH 43215 Telephone: 614-224-6000 Facsimile: 614-224-6066 6 7 8 CASEY GERRY SCHENK FRANCAVILLA BLATT & PENFIELD LLP Mark Ankcorn (State Bar No. 166871) mark@cglaw.com 110 Laurel Street San Diego, CA 92101 Telephone: 619-238-1811 Facsimile: 619-544-9232 10 2029 Century Park East Los Angeles, California 90067-3086 STROOCK & STROOCK & LAVAN LLP 9 11 12 13 14 17 TERRELL MARSHALL DAUDT & WILLIE PLLC Beth E. Terrell (State Bar No. 178181) bterrell@tmdwlaw.com 936 North 34th Street, Suite 400 Seattle, WA 98103-8869 Telephone: 206-816-6603 Facsimile: 206-350-3528 18 Attorneys for Plaintiff Steinfeld and the Proposed Class 15 16 19 20 21 22 [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR GOOD CAUSE APPEARING AND PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 24 October 15, 2012 Dated:________________________ 25 __________________________________________ Hon. Jeffrey S. White United States District Court Judge 26 27 -3- 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Case No. 3:12-cv-01118-JSW LA 51591922v1 Case3:12-cv-01118-JSW Document28 Filed10/11/12 Page5 of 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 1 I hereby certify that, on October 11, 2012, copies of the foregoing STIPULATION AND 3 [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND 4 TO COMPLAINT FROM OCTOBER 11, 2012 TO DECEMBER 11, 2012 AND INITIAL 5 CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE FROM NOVEMBER 16, 2012 TO JANUARY 18, 6 2013 were filed electronically and served by U.S. Mail on anyone unable to accept electronic 7 filing. Notice of this filing will be sent by e-mail to all parties by operation of the court’s electronic 8 filing system or by facsimile to anyone unable to accept electronic filing as indicated on the Notice 9 of Electronic Filing. Parties may access this filing through the court’s EM/ECF System. 10 2029 Century Park East Los Angeles, California 90067-3086 STROOCK & STROOCK & LAVAN LLP 2 11 By: 12 /s/ Lisa M. Simonetti Lisa M. Simonetti 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT Case No. 3:12-cv-01118-JSW LA 51591922v1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?