Greenspan v. Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP et al

Filing 9

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION OF PAUL HASTINGS DEFENDANTS FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THE REFERENCE TO THE BANKRUPCTY COURT. Plaintiff's Opposition due by 4/6/2012. Paul Hastings Defendants' Replies due by 4/20/2012. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 3/27/12. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/27/2012)

1
2
3
4
5

DAVID GOULD, APC
DAVID GOULD, SBN 37947
23975 Park Sorrento, Suite 200
Calabasas, CA 91302-4011
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
Counsel for Ronald F. Greenspan
Chapter 7 Trustee for Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison LLP

6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

11
12

;VaVWVhVh( ;Va^[dgc^V

<Vk^Y ?djaY( 9H;

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

)
)
BROBECK, PHLEGER & HARRISON LLP, )
)
)
Debtor.
)
)
)
)
)
RONALD F. GREENSPAN, Chapter 7 Trustee )
)
for Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison LLP,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
PAUL HASTINGS, LLP, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)

In re

Chapter 7
District Court Case No. 12-01148 (CRB)
BK Case No. 03-32715 (DM)
Adv. Pro. No. 11-03229 (DM)
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR MOTION
OF PAUL HASTINGS DEFENDANTS FOR
WITHDRAWAL OF THE REFERENCE TO
THE BANKRUPTCY COURT

22
23

This stipulation is entered into by and between Plaintiff, Ronald F. Greenspan, Chapter 7

24

Trustee for Brobeck, Phleger & Harrison, LLP (“Plaintiff”), and Defendants Paul Hastings LLP

25

(successor to Paul, Hastings, Janofsky and Walker LLP), Kenneth R. Bender, John F. Hilson,

26

Christopher H. McGrath, Mark E. McKeen, Howard M. Privette II and William F. Sullivan

27

(collectively, the “Paul Hastings Defendants”).

28
-1CASE NO. 12-01148 (CRB)

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING
SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO WITHDRAW REFERENCE

1
2

WHEREAS, the Paul Hastings Defendants filed a Motion for Withdrawal of the Reference to
the Bankruptcy Court (“Motion”) on February 21, 2012;

3

WHEREAS, the Motion is set for hearing on May 4, 2012, at 10:00 a.m.; and

4

WHEREAS, Plaintiff and the Paul Hastings Defendants wish to set a mutually convenient

5
6
7

briefing schedule on the Motion;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE, either for
themselves or through their counsel, that:

8

1.

Plaintiff’s Opposition to the Motion shall be due on April 6, 2012.

9

2.

The Paul Hastings Defendants’ Reply in support of the Motion shall be due on April

10

20, 2012.

11

Dated: March 23, 2012

12

By:

14

_/s/ David Gould_________________
David Gould, Counsel

15
16

Dated: March 23, 2012

17
18
19
20
21

THE PAUL HASTINGS DEFENDANTS
PAUL HASTINGS LLP (Successor to Paul,
Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP)
KENNETH R. BENDER
JOHN F. HILSON
CHRISTOPHER H. McGRATH
MARK E. McKEEN
HOWARD M. PRIVETTE II
WILLIAM F. SULLIVAN
By: IRELL & MANELLA LLP

22
_/s/ Marc S. Maister________________
Marc S. Maister,TCounsel
S DIS RI

23

S

R NIA

FO

RT

27

NO

26

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
27
Dated: March ____ , 2012
_______________________________
er
United States les R. Brey Judge
har District
Judge C

28
-2CASE NO. 12-01148 (CRB)

A

H

ER

LI

25

CT
C

RT
U
O

24

TE
TA

UNIT
ED

;VaVWVhVh( ;Va^[dgc^V

<Vk^Y ?djaY( 9H;

13

PLAINTIFF
RONALD F. GREENSPAN, CHAPTER 7
TRUSTEE FOR BROBECK, PHLEGER &
HARRISON LLP

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE BRIEFING
SCHEDULE FOR MOTION TO WITHDRAW REFERENCE