Chastang v. Virga

Filing 15

ORDER DENYING EXTENSION OF TIME. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 2/8/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/8/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 LOTICOL CHASTANG, 10 11 12 13 Petitioner, vs. T. VIRGA, Warden, Respondent. 14 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. C 12-1166 JSW (PR) ORDER DENYING EXTENSION OF TIME (Docket No. 14) 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 This case was dismissed on January 7, 2013. Petitioner has filed a motion for an extension of time in which to “file objections to Magistrate Judge recommendations.” The motion is DENIED because Petitioner has no right to file such objections as the judgment and order were issued by the undersigned District Judge. If he wishes to appeal the judgment, he must file a notice of appeal, for which he is granted an extension of time to and including March 1, 2013. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: February 8, 2013 JEFFREY S. WHITE United States District Judge 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 6 LOTICOL KIRK CHASTANG, Plaintiff, 7 8 9 10 Case Number: CV12-01166 JSW CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE v. T. VIRGA et al, Defendant. / 11 12 13 14 15 I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on February 8, 2013, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. 16 17 18 19 Loticol Kirk Chastang F41212 CSP Sacramento C6-110 P.O. Box 290066 Represa, CA 95671 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: February 8, 2013 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: Jennifer Ottolini, Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?