Baner v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 11

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 10 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Setting Briefing Schedule on Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. : Motion Hearing set for 5/8/2012 09:00 AM in Courtroom E, 15th Floor, San Francisco before Magistrate Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte. Motion to be filed and served by 4/2/2012. Responses due by 4/16/2012. Replies due by 4/23/2012.Signed by Judge Elizabeth D Laporte on 3/20/2012. (kns, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/21/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT A NGLIN F LEWELLING R ASMUSSEN C AMPBELL & T RYTTEN LLP 8 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 10 11 WILLIAM B. BANER, an individual, 12 13 14 15 16 17 Case No.: 3:12-cv-01189-EDL Plaintiff, [Assigned to the Hon. Elizabeth D. LaPorte] v. ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION SETTING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION HEARING AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE AS MODIFIED WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., also known as WACHOVIA MORTGAGE, a division of WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., and formerly known as WACHOVIA MORTGAGE, FSB; CAL-WESTERN RECONVEYANCE CORPORATION, a California Corporation; DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, Defendants. 18 19 20 21 22 23 Having read and considered the foregoing stipulation, and good cause appearing: 24 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 25 1. 8 A preliminary injunction hearing is set for May 1, 2012 at 9:00 a.m. in courtroom 26 E of the above Court. Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction shall be filed 27 and served by April 2, 2012. In response, Wells Fargo’s opposition must be filed 28 and served by April 16, 2012. Plaintiff’s reply brief is due by April 23, 2012. 93000/BR0187/00344859-1 1 CASE NO. 3:12-CV-01189-EDL ORDER RE STIP SETTING PRELIM. INJ. HEARING AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE 1 2 3 2. Wells Fargo and its trustee shall not proceed with a foreclosure with respect to the subject property, located at 10 Crystal Springs Road, Unit 2213, San Mateo, 9 California, until on or after May 2, 2012. 4 5 6 Dated: March 20 , 2012 HON. ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 A NGLIN F LEWELLING R ASMUSSEN C AMPBELL & T RYTTEN LLP 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 93000/BR0187/00344859-1 2 CASE NO. 3:12-CV-01189-EDL ORDER RE STIP SETTING PRELIM. INJ. HEARING AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE 1 2 3 4 5 6 A NGLIN F LEWELLING R ASMUSSEN C AMPBELL & T RYTTEN LLP 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, the undersigned, declare that I am over the age of 18 and am not a party to this action. I am employed in the City of Pasadena, California; my business address is Anglin, Flewelling, Rasmussen, Campbell & Trytten LLP, 199 S. Los Robles Avenue, Suite 600, Pasadena, California 91101-2459. On the date below, I served a copy of the foregoing document entitled: ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION SETTING PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION HEARING AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE on all interested parties in said case as follows: 8 9 Served Electronically Via the Court’s CM/ECF System Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant Cal-Western Reconveyance Corporation 10 11 12 13 Chris L. Norris, Esq. LAW OFFICES OF CHRIS L. NORRIS 601 Van Ness Avenue, Suite 2056 San Francisco, CA 94102 Tel: 415.692.1501 | Fax: 415.294.9022 Email: chris.norris.esq@gmail.com Robin Prema Wright, Esq. Nicole K. Neff, Esq. WRIGHT, FINLAY & ZAK, LLP 4665 MacArthur Court, Suite 280 Newport Beach, CA 9266 Tel: 949.477.5050 Email: rwright@wrightlegal.net Email: nneff@wrightlegal.net 14 15 16 17 I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct. I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the Bar of this Court at whose direction the service was made. This declaration is executed in Pasadena, California, on March 15, 2012. 18 19 Barbara Cruz (Type or Print Name) /s/ Barbara Cruz (Signature of Declarant) 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 93000/BR0187/00344859-1{ 1 CASE NO. 3:12-CV-01189-EDL CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?