Yahoo! Inc. v. Facebook, Inc.
Filing
31
Proposed Order re 29 MOTION to Strike and/or Dismiss Yahoo Inc.'s Claims and Defenses of Inequitable Conduct by Facebook, Inc.. (Keefe, Heidi) (Filed on 5/16/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
COOLEY LLP
STEPHEN C. NEAL (170085)
(nealsc@cooley.com)
MICHAEL G. RHODES (116127)
(rhodesmg@cooley.com)
HEIDI L. KEEFE (178960)
(hkeefe@cooley.com)
MARK R. WEINSTEIN (193043)
(mweinstein@cooley.com)
5 Palo Alto Square
3000 El Camino Real
Palo Alto, CA 94306-2155
Telephone:
(650) 843-5000
Facsimile:
(650) 849-7400
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING
HALE AND DORR LLP
WILLIAM F. LEE (Pro Hac Vice)
(william.lee@wilmerhale.com)
CYNTHIA D. VREELAND (Pro Hac Vice)
(cynthia.vreeland@wilmerhale.com)
60 State Street
Boston, MA 02109
Telephone: (617) 526-6148
Facsimile:
(617) 526-5000
MARK D. SELWYN (244180)
(mark.selwyn@wilmerhale.com)
JOSEPH F. HAAG (248749)
(joseph.haag@wilmerhale.com)
950 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, CA 94304
Telephone: (650) 858-6031
Facsimile:
(650) 858-6100
8
9
Attorneys for Defendant
FACEBOOK, INC.
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
14
15
YAHOO! INC.,
Case No. CV-12-01212-JSW
16
Plaintiff,
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
FACEBOOK, INC.’S MOTION TO STRIKE
AND/OR DISMISS YAHOO’S CLAIMS AND
DEFENSES OF INEQUITABLE CONDUCT
17
v.
18
FACEBOOK, INC.,
19
Defendant.
20
21
This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Facebook, Inc.’s Motion to Strike
22
and/or Dismiss Yahoo’s Claims and Defenses of Inequitable Conduct. After due consideration,
23
and for good cause shown, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to Strike and/or
24
Dismiss Yahoo’s Claims and Defenses of Inequitable Conduct is GRANTED.
25
IT IS SO ORDERED.
26
27
Dated:
HON. JEFFREY S. WHITE
28
COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO
1031064 v1/HN
1.
[PROPOSED ] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STRIKE
AND/OR DISMISS
CV-12--01212-JSW
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?