Yahoo! Inc. v. Facebook, Inc.

Filing 39

STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER DISMISSING CASE filed by Yahoo! Inc.. (Smith, Kevin) (Filed on 7/9/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Charles K. Verhoeven (Bar No. 170151) charlesverhoeven@quinnemanuel.com Jennifer A. Kash (Bar No. 203679) jenniferkash@quinnemanuel.com Kevin A. Smith (Bar No. 250814) kevinsmith@quinnemanuel.com QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 50 California Street, 22nd Floor San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 875-6600 Facsimile: (415) 875-6700 7 Attorneys for Plaintiff Yahoo! Inc. 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 12 YAHOO! INC., Plaintiff, 13 14 15 Case No. CV-12-01212-JSW v. FACEBOOK, INC., Defendant. 16 Honorable Jeffrey S. White United States District Judge 17 18 FACEBOOK, INC., 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATED MOTION FOR DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS AND COUNTERCLAIMS BY YAHOO! INC. AND FACEBOOK, INC., AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Counterclaim-plaintiff, v. YAHOO! INC., Counterclaim-defendant. 1 Yahoo! Inc. (“Yahoo!”) and Facebook, Inc. (“Facebook”), pursuant to Federal Rule of 2 3 Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), hereby stipulate and move for an order dismissing WITH PREJUDICE 4 and in their entirety all claims and counterclaims of infringement asserted by any party in this 5 case. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), Yahoo! and Facebook also hereby 6 7 stipulate and move for an order dismissing WITHOUT PREJUDICE and in their entirety all 8 defenses of patentability, invalidity, and unenforceability. Each party shall bear its own costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees, and this case shall be 9 10 closed. 11 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 12 Dated: July 9, 2012 13 By: /s/ Mark Weinstein Stephen Neal Michael Rhodes Heidi Keefe Mark Weinstein Cooley LLP 5 Palo Alto Square 3000 El Camino Real Palo Alto, CA 94306 14 15 16 17 18 William F. Lee Cynthia D. Vreeland Joseph Haag Mark Selwyn Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP 60 State Street Boston, MA 02109 Attorneys for Facebook, Inc. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 STIPULATED MOTION FOR DISMISSAL CASE NO. CV-12-01212-JSW 1 2 Dated: July 9, 2012 3 By: /s/ Kevin Smith Charles K. Verhoeven Jennifer A. Kash Kevin A. Smith Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP 50 California Street, 22nd Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: 415-875-6600 Attorneys for Yahoo! Inc. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ATTESTATION OF E-FILED SIGNATURE 11 12 13 14 15 I, Kevin A. Smith, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this Stipulation. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Mark Weinstein, counsel for Facebook, Inc., has concurred in this filing. Dated: July 9, 2012 /s/ Kevin A. Smith Kevin A. Smith 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATED MOTION FOR DISMISSAL CASE NO. CV-12-01212-JSW 1 2 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 4 Dated: 5 By: Honorable Jeffrey S. White United States District Court Judge 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIPULATED MOTION FOR DISMISSAL CASE NO. CV-12-01212-JSW 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2 3 4 5 I, Kevin A. Smith, declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California and the United States that the following is true and correct: On July 9, 2012 I caused to be served the following document(s): 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 STIPULATED MOTION FOR DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS AND COUNTERCLAIMS BY YAHOO! INC. AND FACEBOOK, INC., AND [PROPOSED] ORDER via electronic mail to the following parties: Michael Rhodes (rhoedsmg@cooley.com) Heidi Keefe (hkeefe@cooley.com) Joseph Haag (joseph.haag@wilmerhale.com) Mark Selwyn (mark.selwyn@wilmerhale.com) Mark Weinstein (mweinstein@cooley.com) Stephen Neal (nealsc@cooley.com) via U.S. Mail to the following parties: 14 15 16 17 18 Cynthia D. Vreeland Lee F. William Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP 60 State Street Boston, MA 02109 Dated: July 9, 2012 /s/ Kevin A. Smith 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 STIPULATED MOTION FOR DISMISSAL CASE NO. CV-12-01212-JSW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?