Porras v. StubHub, Inc.

Filing 16

ORDER RE: STIPULATED REQUEST TO EXTEND DEFENDANT'S TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT. Defendant shall file an answer or a motion to dismiss by April 30, 2012. Plaintiff shall file an opposition to any motion to dismiss by May 29, 2012. Defendant shall file a reply to any opposition by June 11, 2012. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on April 3, 2012. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/3/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

David J. Lender (pro hac vice pending)
Eric S. Hochstadt (pro hac vice pending)
Kristen M. Echemendia (pro hac vice pending)
WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
767 Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10153
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

11

Christopher J. Cox (Bar No. 151650)
Liani Kotcher (Bar No. 277282)
WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
201 Redwood Shores Parkway
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

12

Attorneys for Defendant StubHub, Inc.

8
9
10

13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
16
17
18

CELINA Z. PORRAS, as an individual, and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff,

19
20

vs.

21
22
23

STUBHUB, INC., and DOES 1 through 100,
inclusive

Case No. 12-cv-1225 (MMC)
STIPULATED REQUEST TO
EXTEND DEFENDANT’S TIME TO
RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S CLASS
ACTION COMPLAINT AND
BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR ANY
MOTION TO DISMISS, OPPOSITION,
AND REPLY AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER

Defendant.

24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND
AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR ANY MOTION
TO DISMISS, OPPOSITION, AND REPLY

Case No. 12-cv-1225 (MMC)

1

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a) and this stipulation, defendant

2

StubHub, Inc. (“Defendant”) hereby requests that the Court extend the deadline for Defendant to

3

file a response to plaintiff Celina Z. Porras’ (“Plaintiff”) Class Action Complaint from April 9,

4

2012 to April 30, 2012, with Plaintiff’s opposition to any motion to dismiss due May 29, 2012

5

and Defendant’s reply due June 11, 2012.

6

WHEREAS, on March 12, 2012, Plaintiff filed a Class Action Complaint; and

7

WHEREAS, on March 19, 2012, Defendant was served with a copy of the Class

8

Action Complaint.

9

1.

Defendant requests that the deadline for it to file its answer or a motion to

10

dismiss the Class Action Complaint be scheduled for April 30, 2012. Plaintiff stipulates to this

11

request.

12
13

2.

motion to dismiss be scheduled for May 29, 2012. Defendant stipulates to this request.

14
15

3.

Defendant requests that the deadline for it to file a reply to any opposition

to its motion to dismiss be scheduled for June 11, 2012. Plaintiff stipulates to this request.

16
17

Plaintiff requests that the deadline for her to file an opposition to any

Counsel for Defendant attests under penalty of perjury that counsel for Plaintiff
concurs in the filing of this stipulated request.

18

SO STIPULATED.

19
20
21

DATED:

March 30, 2012

CELINA Z. PORRAS

STUBHUB, INC.

By:
/s/ Peter M. Hart
___
LAW OFFICES OF PETER M. HART
Peter M. Hart (SBN 198691)
Amber S. Healy (SBN 232730)
12121 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 205
Los Angeles, CA 90025
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

By:
/s/ Liani Kotcher
WEIL GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
Christopher J. Cox (Bar No. 151650)
Liani Kotcher (Bar No. 277282)
201 Redwood Shores Parkway
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND
AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR ANY MOTION
TO DISMISS, OPPOSITION, AND REPLY

1

Case No. 12-cv-1225 (MMC)

1
2
3
4

David J. Lender
(pro hac vice pending)
Eric S. Hochstadt
(pro hac vice pending)
Kristen M. Echemendia
(pro hac vice pending)
767 Fifth Avenue
New York, NY 10153
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

LAW OFFICE OF KENNETH H. YOON, APC
One Wilshire Blvd., Suite 2200
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

5
6

Attorneys for Plaintiff Celina Z. Porras

7
8

Attorneys for Defendant StubHub, Inc.
9
10
[PROPOSED] ORDER

11
12
13

Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED.

3
2
Dated: April ___, 2012

14
15

______________________________________
Honorable Maxine M. Chesney
United States District Court Judge
Northern District of California

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO RESPOND
AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR ANY MOTION
TO DISMISS, OPPOSITION, AND REPLY

2

Case No. 12-cv-1225 (MMC)