Porras v. StubHub, Inc.
Filing
25
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MISCELLANEOUS ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE PENDING RESOLUTION OF MOTION TO DISMISS. The Case Management Conference, currently scheduled for July 27, 2012, is continued to September 21, 2012. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on June 20, 2012. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/20/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
13
14
CELINA Z. PORRAS, as an individual, and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,
15
16
17
18
19
Plaintiff,
vs.
STUBHUB, INC., and DOES 1 through 100,
inclusive
Defendants.
20
Case No. 12-cv-1225 (MMC)
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
DEFENDANT’S MISCELLANEOUS
ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST TO
CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE PENDING
RESOLUTION OF MOTION TO
DISMISS
Hearing Date: July 27, 2012
Courtroom: 7, 19th Floor
Time: 9:00 am
Honorable Maxine M. Chesney
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MISCELLANEOUS
ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE PENDING RESOLUTION OF MOTION TO DISMISS
CASE NO. 12-CV-1225 (MMC)
1
The Court has received Defendant’s Miscellaneous Administrative Request to
2
Continue the Case Management Conference Pending Resolution of the Motion to Dismiss, and
3
Declaration of Eric S. Hochstadt in support thereof.
4
5
Good cause appearing, Defendant’s Administrative Request to continue the Case
6
Management Conference pending resolution of the motion to dismiss is GRANTED. The Case
Management Conference, currently scheduled for July 27, 2012, is hereby CONTINUED to
September 21, 2012.
7
June 20
DATED: ________________, 2012
8
_______________________________________
HONORABLE MAXINE M. CHESNEY
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MISCELLANEOUS
ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE PENDING RESOLUTION OF MOTION TO DISMISS
1
CASE NO. 12-CV-1225 (MMC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?