Lillicotch v. Nationwide Insurance Company

Filing 26

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 25 TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 11/5/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/5/2012)

1
2
3
4
5

JOHN BURNITE (SBN 162223)
Email: [e-mail]
SHIVANI NANDA (SBN 253891)
Email: [e-mail]
WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ,
EDELMAN & DICKER LLP
525 Market Street, 17th Floor
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]

6
7
8

Attorneys for Defendant
NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE
COMPANY (Erroneously named and served herein
AS NATIONWIDE INSURANCE COMPANY)

9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12

JOHN LILLICOTCH,

13

Plaintiff,

Case No.: C 12-01226 RS
STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH
PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED] ORDER

14

vs.

15

NATIONWIDE INSURANCE COMPANY,
and DOES 1-30 INCLUSIVE,

16
Defendants.
17
18
19

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), by

20

and between plaintiff John Lillicotch and defendant Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company

21

(erroneously sued herein as Nationwide Insurance Company) through their attorneys of record, as

22

follows:

23

1.

The parties have reached a confidential settlement of all claims asserted or that could

24

have been asserted in this action.

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///
1
STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE
USDC NDCA CASE NO. C 12-01226 RS

1
2

2.

The parties, through their counsel, stipulate to dismiss this action with prejudice, with

each party to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees.

3
4

Date: November 5, 2012

WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ,
EDELMAN & DICKER LLP

5
6

By:

7
8
9

/s/ Shivani Nanda
JOHN T. BURNITE
SHIVANI NANDA
Attorneys for Defendant
NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE
COMPANY (Erroneously named and served
herein as NATIONWIDE INSURANCE
COMPANY)

10
11

Date: November 5, 2012

INSURANCE LITIGATORS & COUNSELORS

12
By:
13
14

/s/ Jospeh John Turri_____________________
JOSEPH JOHN TURRI
Attorneys for Plaintiff
JOHN LILLICOTCH

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE
USDC NDCA CASE NO. C 12-01226 RS

1
2

ATTESTATION CERTIFICATE
In accord with the Northern District of California’s General Order No. 45, Section X.(B),

3

I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other

4

signatories who are listed on the signature page.

5
6

/s/ Shivani Nanda

7

SHIVANI NANDA

8

WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ,
EDELMAN & DICKER LLP
525 Market Street, 17th Floor
San Francisco, California 94105
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3
STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE
USDC NDCA CASE NO. C 12-01226 RS

1

[PROPOSED] ORDER

2

The parties having stipulated that the above-entitled action, and all claims for relief therein,

3

shall be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a), with each party

4

to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees,

5

IT IS SO ORDERED.

6
7
8

11/5/12
Dated: ________

By:
Honorable Richard Seeborg
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE
USDC NDCA CASE NO. C 12-01226 RS