Lillicotch v. Nationwide Insurance Company
Filing
26
STIPULATION AND ORDER RE 25 TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 11/5/12. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/5/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
JOHN BURNITE (SBN 162223)
Email: John.Burnite@wilsonelser.com
SHIVANI NANDA (SBN 253891)
Email: Shivani.Nanda@wilsonelser.com
WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ,
EDELMAN & DICKER LLP
525 Market Street, 17th Floor
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone:
(415) 433-0990
Facsimile:
(415) 434-1370
6
7
8
Attorneys for Defendant
NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE
COMPANY (Erroneously named and served herein
AS NATIONWIDE INSURANCE COMPANY)
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
JOHN LILLICOTCH,
13
Plaintiff,
Case No.: C 12-01226 RS
STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH
PREJUDICE; [PROPOSED] ORDER
14
vs.
15
NATIONWIDE INSURANCE COMPANY,
and DOES 1-30 INCLUSIVE,
16
Defendants.
17
18
19
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), by
20
and between plaintiff John Lillicotch and defendant Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
21
(erroneously sued herein as Nationwide Insurance Company) through their attorneys of record, as
22
follows:
23
1.
The parties have reached a confidential settlement of all claims asserted or that could
24
have been asserted in this action.
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE
USDC NDCA CASE NO. C 12-01226 RS
1
2
2.
The parties, through their counsel, stipulate to dismiss this action with prejudice, with
each party to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees.
3
4
Date: November 5, 2012
WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ,
EDELMAN & DICKER LLP
5
6
By:
7
8
9
/s/ Shivani Nanda
JOHN T. BURNITE
SHIVANI NANDA
Attorneys for Defendant
NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE
COMPANY (Erroneously named and served
herein as NATIONWIDE INSURANCE
COMPANY)
10
11
Date: November 5, 2012
INSURANCE LITIGATORS & COUNSELORS
12
By:
13
14
/s/ Jospeh John Turri_____________________
JOSEPH JOHN TURRI
Attorneys for Plaintiff
JOHN LILLICOTCH
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE
USDC NDCA CASE NO. C 12-01226 RS
1
2
ATTESTATION CERTIFICATE
In accord with the Northern District of California’s General Order No. 45, Section X.(B),
3
I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other
4
signatories who are listed on the signature page.
5
6
/s/ Shivani Nanda
7
SHIVANI NANDA
8
WILSON, ELSER, MOSKOWITZ,
EDELMAN & DICKER LLP
525 Market Street, 17th Floor
San Francisco, California 94105
Tel: (415) 433-0990
Fax: (415) 434-1370
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE
USDC NDCA CASE NO. C 12-01226 RS
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
2
The parties having stipulated that the above-entitled action, and all claims for relief therein,
3
shall be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a), with each party
4
to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees,
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
7
8
11/5/12
Dated: ________
By:
Honorable Richard Seeborg
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE
USDC NDCA CASE NO. C 12-01226 RS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?