Eisner v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America et al
ORDER APPROVING PARTIES' STIPULATION REGARDING REASONABLE ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS AND CLOSING CASE re 71 Judgment; 73 Stipulation and Order; 74 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Re Plaintiff's Reasonable Attorneys 9; Fees and Costs filed by The Prudential Insurance Company of America; 75 Satisfaction of Judgment, filed by The Prudential Insurance Company of America. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on June 16, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/16/2014)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DEBRA J. EISNER,
Case No. 12-cv-01238-JST
THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE
COMPANY OF AMERICA,
United States District Court
Northern District of California
ORDER APPROVING PARTIES’
REASONABLE ATTORNEYS’ FEES
AND COSTS AND CLOSING CASE
Re: ECF Nos. 71, 73, 74, 75
On April 28, 2014, the Court ordered the parties: (1) to submit to the Court by July 25,
2014, a joint report stating whether the matter of the Plaintiff’s entitlement to benefits for the
period after September 10, 2012 has been resolved; and (2) to meet and confer regarding the
amount, if any, of Plaintiff’s recovery of reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs, and to submit a
proposed order to the Court if the parties agreed on that amount. ECF No. 73. On June 13, 2014,
the parties submitted to the Court a stipulation explaining that the parties had agreed upon the
amount of attorneys’ fees and costs, and that the Defendant had paid Plaintiff’s attorney the full
amount agreed upon. ECF No. 74. On June 13, 2014, the parties also filed an Acknowledgment
of Full Satisfaction of the Court’s March 12, 2014 judgment. ECF No. 75 at 2. The
Acknowledgment states that all judgments and orders arising out of this action have been resolved.
The Court hereby acknowledges and APPROVES the parties’ stipulation regarding
attorneys’ fees and costs. The Clerk shall close the file.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 16, 2014
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?