Securities & Exchange Commission v. Mazzola et al

Filing 109

ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO CONTINUE TRIAL DATE. The current trial dates are vacated. A case management conference is set for March 14, 2014, at 10:30 a.m. A Joint Case Management Statement shall be filed no later than March 7, 2014. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on January 15, 2014. (mmclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/15/2014)

Download PDF
1 JINA L. CHOI (N.Y. Bar No. 2699718) MICHAEL S. DICKE (Cal. Bar No. 158187) 2 ROBERT L. MITCHELL (Cal. Bar No. 161354) mitchellr@sec.gov 3 ROBERT L. TASHJIAN (Cal Bar No. 191007) tashjianr@sec.gov 4 AARON ARNZEN (Cal. Bar No. 218272) arnzena@sec.gov 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff 6 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 2800 7 San Francisco, CA 94104 (415) 705-2500 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 12 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Case No. 12-cv-1258 MMC 13 Plaintiff, ORDER APPROVING 14 v. 15 FRANK MAZZOLA, FELIX INVESTMENTS, LLC, and 16 FACIE LIBRE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, LLC, 17 Defendants. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL DATE Current Trial Date: January 21, 2014 Time: 9:00 a.m. Place: Courtroom 7, 19th Floor 1 Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) and defendants Frank 2 Mazzola, Felix Investments, LLC, and Facie Libre Management Associates, LLC (collectively, the 3 “Defendants”) have entered into the following stipulation and ask the Court to enter the Proposed 4 Order continuing the trial date, as follows: 5 1. Defendants have submitted to the Commission a signed offer to settle this matter. If 6 accepted by the Commission and entered by the Court, Defendants’ offer of settlement would resolve 7 the claims in this matter entirely. The Commission’s undersigned counsel will recommend that the 8 Commission accept Defendants’ offer of settlement. 9 2. The Commission, as a public agency, follows a process for consideration of such 10 offers that Commission’s counsel estimates will require approximately six to eight weeks to 11 complete. 12 3. Selection of the jury in this matter is scheduled for January 16, 2014, and trial is 13 scheduled to begin on January 21, 2014. 14 4. The Commission and the Defendants believe it is in their best interests, and in the 15 interest of efficiency and judicial economy, to allow the time for the Commission to consider the 16 Defendants’ settlement offer prior to a jury trial of this matter. In particular, if the Commission 17 accepts the offer, a jury trial would be unnecessary and this case would be resolved subject to this 18 Court’s approval of the parties’ settlement. 19 // 20 // 21 // 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 SEC V. MAZZOLA, ET AL., 12-CV-1258 MMC STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL 1 THEREFORE, the parties agree and hereby request the Court to vacate the current trial 2 dates. The parties further request that the Court set a case management conference for Friday, 3 March 14, 2014 at 10:30 a.m. By that date the parties expect to be able to apprise the Court as to 4 the acceptance or rejection of the offer. 5 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 6 7 8 DATED: January 13, 2014 Respectfully submitted, 9 10 /s/ Robert L. Tashjian ROBERT L. TASHJIAN Attorney for Plaintiff SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION 11 12 13 14 /s/ Jahan Raissi JAHAN RAISSI Attorney for Defendants FRANK MAZZOLA, FELIX INVESTMENTS, LLC, and FACIE LIBRE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, LLC 15 16 17 18 19 * * * 20 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 22 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file, no later than March 7, 2014, a Joint Case Management Statement. 23 24 Dated: January 15, 2014 Hon. Maxine M. Chesney United States District Judge 25 26 27 28 2 SEC V. MAZZOLA, ET AL., 12-CV-1258 MMC STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?