Hughes v. Knipp
Filing
5
ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO COMPLETE IN FORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION. Signed by Judge Thelton E. Henderson on 04/10/2012. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(tmi, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/12/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
No. C-12-1276 TEH (PR)
MICHAEL LYNN HUGHES,
Petitioner,
ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO
COMPLETE IN FORMA PAUPERIS
APPLICATION
v.
WILLIAM KNIPP, Warden,
Respondent.
/
17
18
On March 14, 2012, Petitioner filed a pro se petition for
19
writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.
20
notified Petitioner in writing at that time that the action was
21
deficient because he did not pay the requisite $ 5.00 filing fee or,
22
instead, submit a signed and completed court-approved in forma
23
pauperis application, including a completed certificate of funds in
24
his prison trust account and a copy of his prison trust account
25
statement for the last six months.
26
The Court
See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2).
On March 26, 2012, Petitioner filed an in forma pauperis
27
application, but did not attached the required completed certificate
28
of funds in his prison trust account.
Petitioner’s in forma
1
pauperis application is therefore incomplete.
2
Petitioner must file a Certificate of Funds in Prisoner’s Trust
3
Account completed and signed by an authorized officer at the prison,
4
or his action will be dismissed, the file closed, and the entire
5
filing fee will become due immediately.
6
By May 14, 2012,
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
8
DATED
4/10/2012
THELTON E. HENDERSON
United States District Judge
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
G:\PRO-SE\TEH\HC.12\Hughes-12-1276-eot-ifp.wpd
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?