MEI 3D, LLC v. Polaroid Eyewear U.S., LLC

Filing 11

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 5/1/12. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/1/2012)

1
2
3
4
5

KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP
ANNE M. ROGASKI (State Bar No. 184754)
1080 Marsh Road
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
MEI 3D, LLC

6
7
8
9

COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
ANITA F. STORK (State Bar No. 142265)
One Front Street, 35th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

10
11

Attorneys for Defendants
POLAROID EYEWEAR U.S., LLC, SAFILO AMERICA, INC.,
SAFILO USA, INC., SAFILO GROUP S.P.A.

12
13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

16

MEI 3D, LLC,
Plaintiff,

17
18
19
20

CASE NO. CV 12-01321 JCS

v.
POLAROID EYEWEAR U.S., LLC,
SAFILO AMERICA, INC., SAFILO USA,
INC., SAFILO GROUP S.P.A. and DOES 15, INCLUSIVE,

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF
TIME TO RESPOND TO THE FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT
INFRINGEMENT
DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

21
Defendant.
22
23
24

TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES AND ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

25

WHEREAS, Plaintiff, MEI 3D, LLC (“MEI 3D”) filed a Complaint for Patent

26

Infringement on March 16, 2012 and First Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement on April

27

6, 2012;

28

WHEREAS, MEI 3D served Defendants Polaroid Eyewear U.S., LLC (“Polaroid”), Safilo
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR
PATENT INFRINGEMENT - CASE NO. CV 12-01321 JCS

-1-

1

America, Inc. (“Safilo America”) and Safilo USA, Inc. (“Safilo USA”) with the Summons and

2

First Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement (“First Amended Complaint”) on April 9, 2012.

3

WHEREAS, Savilo Group S.p.A. (“Safilo Group”) has not yet been served with the

4
5
6
7
8
9

Summons and First Amended Complaint;
WHEREAS, counsel for Defendants has agreed to accept service on the Safilo Group’s
behalf; and
WHEREAS, MEI 3D has, in exchange, agreed to an extension of 60 days for all
Defendants to answer or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint.
IT IS THEREBY STIPULATED, by and between counsel for MEI 3D and Defendants

10

pursuant to Local Rule 6-1 that the time in which Defendants may answer or otherwise respond to

11

the Amended Complaint in the above-referenced proceeding shall be extended to and include June

12

29, 2012.

13

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED, by and between counsel for MEI 3D and Defendants that

14

Safilo Group shall be deemed as having been duly served with the Summons and First Amended

15

Complaint.

16
17

DATED:

April 27, 2012

Respectfully submitted,
KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP

18
19

By: /s/ Anne M. Rogaski

ANNE M. ROGASKI

20

Attorneys for Plaintiff
MEI 3D, LLC

21
22
23

DATED:

April 27, 2012

Respectfully submitted,
COVINGTON & BURLING LLP

24
25

By: /s/ Anita F. Stork

ANITA F. STORK
Attorneys for Defendants
POLAROID EYEWEAR U.S., LLC, SAFILO
AMERICA, INC., SAFILO USA, INC., SAFILO
GROUP S.P.A.

26
27
28

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR
PATENT INFRINGEMENT - CASE NO. CV 12-01321 JCS

-2-

1

ATTESTATION CLAUSE REGARDING SIGNATURES

2

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, I attest under

3

penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from Anita F.

4

Stork.

5

DATED: April 27, 2012

KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP

6
7

By: /s/ Anne M. Rogaski

8

Attorneys for Plaintiff
MEI 3D, LLC

ANNE M. ROGASKI

9
64023601 v1

ER

Spero

FO

seph C.

Judge Jo

R NIA

ERED

H

16

RT

15

O ORD
IT IS S

NO

14

Dated: May 1, 2012

LI

13

UNIT
ED

12

ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T

RT
U
O

S

11

A

10

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR
PATENT INFRINGEMENT - CASE NO. CV 12-01321 JCS

-3-