Brod v. Sioux Honey Association,Cooperative

Filing 27

STIPULATION AND ORDER RESETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE re 25 MOTION to Dismiss . Responses due by 6/20/2012. Replies due by 6/27/2012. Motion Hearing set for 7/20/2012 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Edward M. Chen.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/6/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/6/2012)

Download PDF
1 5 Laurence D. King (SBN 206423) Linda M. Fong (SBN 124232) KAPLAN FOX & KILSHEIMER LLP 350 Sansome Street, Suite 400 San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: 415-772-4700 Facsimile: 415-772-4707 Email: lking@kaplanfox.com lfong@kaplanfox.com 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff Gregory Brod 7 [Additional counsel listed on signature block] 2 3 4 8 9 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ) ) GREGORY BROD, Individually and on Behalf ) of All Others Similarly Situated, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) SIOUX HONEY ASSOCIATION, ) COOPERATIVE, an Iowa entity, ) ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) Case No.: 12-CV-01322 EMC CLASS ACTION STIPULATION RE EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITON TO MOTION TO DISMISS ; ORDER Hearing Date: N/A Hearing Time: N/A Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen 23 24 WHEREAS on May 29, 2012, Defendant Sioux Honey Association, Cooperative filed its 25 Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rules 12(b)(1) and 12 (b)(6), currently set for hearing 26 on July 20, 2012. Plaintiff Gregory Brod’s response is due June 12, 2012 and Sioux Honey’s Reply 27 June 19, 2012. 28 STIPULATION RE EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITON TO MOTION TO DISMISS No. 12-CV-01322 EMC 1 2 3 4 5 WHEREAS Brod seeks an extension to file his Opposition to June 20, 2012, and Defendant seeks to file its Reply on June 27, 2012, which will not affect the hearing date of July 20, 2012. WHEREAS the parties have not previously requested an extension in connection with the pending motion to dismiss. WHEREFOR pursuant to Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12, Brod and Defendant respectfully 6 request that the court issue an order permitting an extension of time within which Brod may file his 7 opposition to the motion to dismiss to on or before June 20, 2012, and Defendant may file its Reply 8 on or before June 27, 2012. 9 SO STIPULATED. 10 HINSHAW & CULBERTSON LLP Dated: June 5, 2012 11 12 s/ David I. Dalby David I. Dalby 13 Attorneys for Defendant Sioux Honey Association Cooperative 14 15 16 Dated: June 5, 2012 KAPLAN FOX & KILSHEIMER LLP 17 18 s/ Linda M. Fong Linda M. Fong 19 Attorneys for Plaintiff Gregory Brod PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED UNIT ED June 6, 2012 Dated: _______________________ 25 RT 27 1 STIPULATION RE EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITON TO MOTION TO DISMISS ER H 28 dward Judge E NO 26 R NIA ______________________________ RED Edward M. Chen SO ORDE IT IS U.S. District Court Judge n M. Che FO 24 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 23 S 22 LI 21 A 20 N D IS T R C No. 12-CV-01322 F EMC O ICT ATTESTATION 1 I, Linda M. Fong, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this 2 Stipulation. In compliance with General Order 45, section X.B., I hereby attest that I have on file 3 the concurrences for any signatures indicated by a “conformed” signature (/s/) within this efiled 4 document. 5 6 7 By: __s/ Linda M. Fong_________________ Linda M. Fong 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION RE EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITON TO MOTION TO DISMISS No. 12-CV-01322 EMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?