Becerra v. Newpark Mall Dental Group et al

Filing 21

ORDER requiring status update by 1/17/2013. Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on 1/7/2013. (lblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/7/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 Northern District of California 10 San Francisco Division GRICELDA BECERRA, 12 For the Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 13 14 Plaintiff, 17 ORDER REQUIRING STATUS UPDATE v. NEWPARK MALL DENTAL GROUP, et al., 15 16 No. C 12-01325 LB Defendants. _____________________________________/ On March 16, 2012, Plaintiff Gricelda Becerra filed a complaint against Defendants Newpark 18 Mall Dental Group (“Newpark Mall Dental”) and Roger Chang (collectively, “Defendants”), 19 alleging wrongful discharge, failure to provide plan information, and breach of fiduciary duty. 20 Complaint, ECF No. 1. On July 23, 2012, the court granted Defendants’ motion to stay the action 21 and compel arbitration based on an arbitration clause in the underlying employment contract 22 between Ms. Becerra and Defendants. Order Granting Motion to Stay, ECF No. 20. In doing so, the 23 court ordered the parties to submit to the court a status update no later than 30 days after a final 24 ruling by the arbitrator is issued. 25 The court has not received a status update yet, so the court presumes that no final arbitration 26 ruling has been issued. Nevertheless, the court now ORDERS the parties to file a written status 27 update, informing the court about the status of the arbitration proceedings, no later than Thursday, 28 January 17, 2013. C 12-01325 LB ORDER 1 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 7, 2013 _______________________________ LAUREL BEELER United States Magistrate Judge 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 For the Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 C 12-01325 LB ORDER 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?