Barnes et al v. The Hershey Company

Filing 267

ORDER granting administrative motion to seal. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 5/8/2015. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/8/2015)

1
2
3
4

DARYL S. LANDY, State Bar No. 136288
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
One Market, Spear Street Tower
San Francisco, CA 94105-1126
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

MICHAEL J. PUMA (admitted pro hac vice)
BRANDON J. BRIGHAM (admitted pro hac vice)
MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
1701 Market Street
Philadelphia, PA 19103
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant
THE HERSHEY COMPANY

13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

16

GREGORY P. BARNES, et al.

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
MORGAN, LEWIS &
BOCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

Plaintiffs,
vs.
THE HERSHEY COMPANY,
Defendant.

Case No. 3:12-cv-01334-CRB
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE
UNDER SEAL DOCUMENTS

1

This Matter came before the Court on the Administrative Motion of Plaintiffs’ to File

2

Under Seal Documents, ECF 260. Having considered the papers submitted and the papers on file

3

in this case, and for the compelling reasons set forth in the Declaration of Brandon J. Brigham in

4

Support of Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Documents, ECF 265, Plaintiffs’

5

Motion is hereby GRANTED, in part, and DENIED, in part, and the Court orders the following

6

documents sealed:

7

1. The redacted portions of the Reply in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary

8

Judgment on Defendant’s Affirmative Defense of Waiver (“Plaintiffs’ Reply”), ECF 265-

9

3;

10
11
12

2. The redacted portions of Exhibits C & G to the Brian J. Malloy in Support in Support of
Plaintiffs’ Reply (“Malloy Declaration”), ECF 265-1, ECF 265-2.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT Plaintiffs shall file in the public record Exhibits A,

13

H, I & J to the Malloy Declaration within ten (10) days of the entry of this Order or those

14

documents will not be considered by the Court when ruling on when ruling on either Defendant

15

The Hershey Company’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, ECF 229, or Plaintiffs’ Motion

16

for Partial Summary Judgment regarding Defendant’s Affirmative Defense of Waiver, ECF 236.

17

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT Plaintiffs shall file in the public record a redacted

18

version of Exhibit B to the Malloy Declaration or a supplemental declaration setting forth the

19

compelling reasons for maintaining the confidentiality of that document within ten (10) days of

20

the entry of this Order or that document will not be considered by the Court when ruling on when

21

ruling on either Defendant The Hershey Company’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, ECF

22

229, or Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment regarding Defendant’s Affirmative

23

Defense of Waiver, ECF 236.

ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

ER

H

MORGAN, LEWIS &
BOCKIUS LLP

R NIA
FO

RT

28

eyer

Honorable Charlese R. arles R. Br
h Breyer
Judg C
United States District Judge
NO

27

LI

26

D
RDERE

OO
IT IS S

A

Dated this 8th day of May, 2015.

UNIT
ED

25

S

IT IS SO ORDERED.

RT
U
O

24

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C