Montgomery v. National City Mortgage et al

Filing 25

ORDER FOR SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING re 12 Amended MOTION to Dismiss Complaint and Each Claim Therein; Memorandum of Points and Authorities In Support filed by PNC Bank, N.A., 16 MOTION to Remand filed by Larry Montgomery. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 5/1/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/1/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 LARRY MONTGOMERY, 9 Plaintiff, 10 v. 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court No. C-12-1359 EMC NATIONAL CITY MORTGAGE, et al., 12 ORDER RE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING AND/OR EVIDENCE Defendants. ___________________________________/ (Docket No. 16) 13 14 15 Plaintiff has moved to remand the instant case, arguing, inter alia, that abstention is 16 appropriate pursuant to Chapman v. Deutsche Bank, 651 F.3d 1039 (9th Cir. 2011). In Chapman, 17 the Ninth Circuit reaffirmed the prior exclusive jurisdiction doctrine -- i.e., “‘[w]here concurrent 18 proceedings in state and federal court are both suits in rem or quasi in rem, the court first assuming 19 jurisdiction over the property may maintain and exercise that jurisdiction to the exclusion of the 20 other.’” Id. at 1041. In his motion, Plaintiff suggests that a state superior court first assumed 21 jurisdiction over the real property at issue. To assess this argument, however, the Court needs to 22 know when exactly the state court unlawful detainer action was filed. Accordingly, the Court orders 23 Plaintiff to file a declaration certifying when the unlawful detainer action was filed. Plaintiff should 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 also attach a copy of the unlawful detainer complaint to his declaration. The filing shall be made 2 within three days of the date of this order. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 Dated: May 1, 2012 7 _________________________ EDWARD M. CHEN United States District Judge 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?