Montgomery v. National City Mortgage et al
Filing
25
ORDER FOR SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING re 12 Amended MOTION to Dismiss Complaint and Each Claim Therein; Memorandum of Points and Authorities In Support filed by PNC Bank, N.A., 16 MOTION to Remand filed by Larry Montgomery. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 5/1/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/1/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
LARRY MONTGOMERY,
9
Plaintiff,
10
v.
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
No. C-12-1359 EMC
NATIONAL CITY MORTGAGE, et al.,
12
ORDER RE SUPPLEMENTAL
BRIEFING AND/OR EVIDENCE
Defendants.
___________________________________/
(Docket No. 16)
13
14
15
Plaintiff has moved to remand the instant case, arguing, inter alia, that abstention is
16
appropriate pursuant to Chapman v. Deutsche Bank, 651 F.3d 1039 (9th Cir. 2011). In Chapman,
17
the Ninth Circuit reaffirmed the prior exclusive jurisdiction doctrine -- i.e., “‘[w]here concurrent
18
proceedings in state and federal court are both suits in rem or quasi in rem, the court first assuming
19
jurisdiction over the property may maintain and exercise that jurisdiction to the exclusion of the
20
other.’” Id. at 1041. In his motion, Plaintiff suggests that a state superior court first assumed
21
jurisdiction over the real property at issue. To assess this argument, however, the Court needs to
22
know when exactly the state court unlawful detainer action was filed. Accordingly, the Court orders
23
Plaintiff to file a declaration certifying when the unlawful detainer action was filed. Plaintiff should
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
also attach a copy of the unlawful detainer complaint to his declaration. The filing shall be made
2
within three days of the date of this order.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
Dated: May 1, 2012
7
_________________________
EDWARD M. CHEN
United States District Judge
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?