Montgomery v. National City Mortgage et al

Filing 35

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 34 for Dismissal with Prejudice filed by Larry Montgomery, Motions terminated: 34 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER for Dismissal with Prejudice filed by Larry Montgomery.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 8/2/12. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/2/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Eric D. Houser (SBN 130079)
Kaitlyn Q. Thinh (SBN 253289)
HOUSER & ALLISON, APC
3760 Kilroy Airport Way, Suite 260
Long Beach, CA 90806
Tel. [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants,
Litton Loan Servicing LP; and Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC

8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12
13

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
LARRY MONTGOMERY, an individual
Plaintiff,

14
15

vs.

16

NATIONAL CITY MORTGAGE, A
DIVISION OF NATIONAL CITY BANK OF
INDIANA; PNC BANK; LITTON LOAN
SERVICING; OCWEN LOAN SERVICING,
LLC; AND DOES 1-100 INCLUSIVE

17
18
19

Case No.: 3:12-cv-01359 EMC
Judge: Hon. Edward M. Chen
[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING
ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION BY
THE PARTIES
[F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)]

Defendants.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Plaintiff LARRY MONTGOMERY and Defendants LITTON LOAN SERVICING LP
and OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC have jointly stipulated to dismiss this action with
prejudice. Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants National City Mortgage and PNC Bank were
dismissed by the Court pursuant to the Court’s Order Granting Motion to Dismiss, docket
_____________________________________________________________________________
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO STIPULATION BY THE PARTIES
1

1

number 30. No other parties have appeared in the action; thus, no other Defendants joined in the

2

Stipulation.

3
4
5
6
7

The Court having considered the Stipulation Dismissing the Action with Prejudice, its
own file, and with good cause showing, orders as follows:
1.

Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), the Action is voluntarily DISMISSED with

prejudice pursuant to the Stipulation filed by the Parties.
2.

Each party is to bear its own fees and costs incurred in litigating this matter.

8

RT

15

dwar
Judge E

ER

17

A

H

16

en

d M. Ch

NO

14

RED

RDE
_________________________________
IS SO O
ITEdward M. Chen
Hon.
R NIA

13

8/2
Dated: ______________, 2012

FO

12

UNIT
ED

11

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

S

10

IT IS SO ORDERED.

LI

9

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
_____________________________________________________________________________
ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO STIPULATION BY THE PARTIES
2

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
_____________________________________________________________________________