Karamsetty v. Wells Fargo & Company et al

Filing 62

ORDER re Sealing the Order on Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on August 7, 2013. (jcslc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/7/2013)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES D
D
DISTRICT C
COURT

5

NORTHER DISTRIC OF CALI
RN
CT
IFORNIA

6
7

VINAY KAR
V
RAMSETTY
Y,

Case No. 1
12-cv-01364
4-JCS

Plaintiff,
8
v.

ORDER R SEALIN ORDER ON
RE
NG
R
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUD
DGMENT

9
10

WELLS FAR
W
RGO & COM
MPANY, et al.,
a
Defendants
s.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13

The Ord Granting Defendants Motion fo Summary Judgment, d
der
g
s’
or
dated Augus 7, 2013,
st

14

has been filed under seal. Dkt. No. 61. The Court intends to p
s
u
D
.
t
publish the e
entire opinion in the
n

15

pub record within ten (10) days of th date of thi Order. Th Court wil publish the opinion
blic
w
he
is
he
ll
e

16

unl the party seeking to redact portions overcom the “stro presump
less
y
mes
ong
ption in favor of access”
r

17

to the courts with “compell
t
w
ling reasons supported b specific fa
by
actual findin
ngs.” Kamak
kana v. City

18

& Cnty. of Hon
C
nolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178-79 (9th Cir. 2006) (
F
h
(internal cita
ations and qu
uotations

19

om
mitted). If an party belie
ny
eves that the Court’s opi
e
inion contain any confidential infor
ns
rmation

20

ent
titled to protection, that party shall file with the C
p
fi
Court a decl
laration estab
blishing such
h

21

ent
titlement and any propos redaction not later t
d
sed
ns
than five (5) days from t date of th Order.
the
his

22

Ob
bjections to proposed red
p
dactions, if any, may be f
filed not late than eight (8) days fro the date
er
t
om

23

of this Order.
t

24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERE
ED.
Da
ated: August 7, 2013
___
__________
___________
__________
________
JO
OSEPH C. SP
PERO
Un
nited States M
Magistrate Ju
udge