Cannon et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Filing
145
ORDER granting 143 STIPULATION to respond to TAC and setting briefing schedule. WF response due 11/1/2013, ASIC response due 11/4/2013. Responses to motions to dismiss due by 11/20/2013. Replies due by 11/27/2013. Motion to Dismiss Hearing set for 12/12/2013 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Edward M. Chen. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 10/30/2013. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/30/2013)
Case3:12-cv-01376-EMC Document143 Filed10/29/13 Page1 of 3
MICHAEL J. STEINER (State Bar No. 112079)
1 mjs@severson.com
MARK D. LONERGAN (State Bar No. 143622)
2 mdl@severson.com
JONAH S. VAN ZANDT (State Bar No. 224348)
3 jvz@severson.com
SEVERSON & WERSON
4 A Professional Corporation
One Embarcadero Center, Suite 2600
5 San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 398-3344
6 Facsimile: (415) 956-0439
7 Attorneys for Defendant
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., and
8 WELLS FARGO INSURANCE, INC.
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA — SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
11 STANLEY D. CANNON, PATRICIA R.
CANNON, and CHERYL BULLOCK,
12 individually and for all other persons similarly
situated,
13
Plaintiffs,
14
vs.
15
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.; WELLS
16 FARGO INSURANCE, INC.; and
AMERICAN SECURITY INSURANCE
17 COMPANY,
18
Case No. 3:12-cv-01376-EMC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR
DEFENDANTS TO RESPOND TO
PLAINTIFFS’ THIRD AMENDED CLASS
ACTION COMPLAINT AND SETTING
BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON MOTIONS
TO DISMISS (L.R. 6-1(a), 6-1(b), 6-2)
Action Filed:
Trial Date:
March 19, 2012
None Set
Defendant.
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
19
20
21
STIPULATION
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a) and 6-1(b), plaintiffs and defendants Wells Fargo Bank,
N.A. (“Wells Fargo”), Wells Fargo Insurance, Inc. (“WFI”), and American Security Insurance
Company (“ASIC”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:
1.
On October 8, 2013, plaintiffs filed their third amended complaint (the “TAC”).
2.
Absent an extension of time, Wells Fargo’s response to the TAC was due
October 25, 2013.
07685.1150/2921517.1
3:12-cv-01376-EMC
STIPULATION RE TIME TO RESPOND TO TAC AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE (L.R. 6-1(a), 6-1(b), 6-2)
Case3:12-cv-01376-EMC Document143 Filed10/29/13 Page2 of 3
1
3.
WFI and ASIC were served with the TAC on October 11, 2013. Their response to
2 the TAC is due November 1, 2013.
3
4.
Wells Fargo, WFI and ASIC intend to file motions to dismiss.
4
5.
The parties hereby stipulate that the deadline for Wells Fargo to respond to the
5 TAC is extended to November 1, 2013.
6
6.
The parties further stipulate that the deadline for ASIC to respond to the TAC shall
7 be November 4, 2013.
8
7.
The parties further stipulate that the deadline for plaintiffs to file oppositions to
9 defendants’ motions to dismiss shall be November 20, 2013, and that the deadline for Wells
10 Fargo, WFI and ASIC to file reply briefs in support of their motions to dismiss shall be
11 November 27, 2013.
12
8.
The parties further stipulate that defendants will notice their motions to dismiss to
13 be heard on December 12, 2013, at 1:30 p.m.
14
9.
This stipulation will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed by
15 court order.
16
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
17 DATED: October 28, 2013
18
SEVERSON & WERSON
A Professional Corporation
19
By:
20
/s/ Jonah S. Van Zandt
Jonah S. Van Zandt
21
Attorneys for Defendants WELLS FARGO BANK,
N.A., and WELLS FARGO INSURANCE, INC.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
07685.1150/2921517.1
2
3:12-cv-01376-EMC
STIPULATION RE TIME TO RESPOND TO TAC AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE (L.R. 6-1(a), 6-1(b), 6-2)
Case3:12-cv-01376-EMC Document143 Filed10/29/13 Page3 of 3
1
DATED: October 28, 2013
SHEPPARD MULLIN RICHTER & HAMPTON, LLP
JORDEN BURT
A Limited Liability Partnership
2
3
4
By:
5
6
/s/ Denise Fee
Denise Fee
Attorneys for Defendant
AMERICAN SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY
7
8
9 DATED: October 28, 2013
10
HIMMELSTEIN LAW NETWORK
LAW OFFICE OF SHERI L. KELLY
11
12
By:
/s/ Sheri L. Kelly
Sheri L. Kelly
13
14
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
STANLEY D. CANNON, PATRICIA R. CANNON,
and CHERYL BULLOCK
15
16
ECF CERTIFICATION
17
I, Jonah S. Van Zandt, am the ECF user whose identification and password are being used
to file this stipulation. I hereby attest that counsel for defendant American Security Insurance
19 Company, Denise Fee, and counsel for plaintiffs, Sheri L. Kelly, concurred in this filing.
18
20
/s/ Jonah S. Van Zandt
Jonah S. Van Zandt
21
ORDER
22
23
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
30
25 DATED: October ___, 2013
26
Hon. Edward M. Chen
United States District Judge
27
28
07685.1150/2921517.1
3
3:12-cv-01376-EMC
STIPULATION RE TIME TO RESPOND TO TAC AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE (L.R. 6-1(a), 6-1(b), 6-2)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?