Cannon et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Filing 180

ORDER GRANTING re 175 MOTION to Shorten Time for Hearing on Defendants' Motion to Stay 174 filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Wells Fargo Insurance Inc. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 2/12/14. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/12/2014)

1 SHEPPARD, MULLIN, RICHTER & HAMPTON LLP
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

A Limited Liability Partnership
Including Professional Corporations
PETER S. HECKER (Bar No. 66159)
[e-mail]
DAVID E. SNYDER (Bar No. 262001)
[e-mail]
Four Embarcadero Center
Seventeenth Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-4109
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
CARLTON FIELDS JORDEN BURT, P.A.

9 FRANK G. BURT (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]

10 W. GLENN MERTEN (pro hac vice)
11 [e-mail]
12
13
14
15

DENISE A. FEE (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
1025 Thomas Jefferson Street, NW
Suite 400 East
Washington, DC 20007-0805
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

16 Attorneys for Defendant

AMERICAN SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY

17

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

18
19
20

STANLEY D. CANNON, PATRICIA R.
21 CANNON, and CHERYL BULLOCK
individually, and for all other persons similarly
22 situated,
Plaintiffs,

23
24

Case No. C12-1376-EMC
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME

v.

25 WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., WELLS

FARGO INSURANCE, INC., and
26 AMERICAN SECURITY INSURANCE
COMPANY,

27

Defendants.

28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME; C12-1376-EMC

1

Having considered the motion of defendants American Security Insurance Company, Wells

2 Fargo Bank, N.A., and Wells Fargo Insurance, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”) to shorten time for
3 a hearing on Defendants’ Motion to Stay Pending Settlement Proceedings in Related Action
4 (“Motion to Stay”), and the Declarations of W. Glenn Merten and Jonah Van Zandt in support
5 thereof, and good cause appearing, the Court hereby GRANTS Defendants’ motion to shorten time
6 and finds that expedited consideration of Defendants’ Motion to Stay is warranted due to the
7 impending discovery response and class certification briefing deadlines. Plaintiffs’ oppositions to
8 the motion to shorten time and the Motion to Stay are due by February 11, 2014 and Defendants’
9 reply in support of the Motion to Stay is due by February 14, 2014. The deadline for Defendants to

ER

18

R NIA

n

M. Che

FO

dward
Judge E

H

17

RT

16

NO

15

___________________________________________
HonorableOVED M. Chen
Edward
APPR District Judge
United States

LI

14

DATED:_________________

A

13

UNIT
ED

S

RT
U
O

10 respond to plaintiffs’ requests for production of documents is extended until this Court rules on the
S DISTRICT
11 Motion to Stay.
TE
C
TA
12
2/12/14

N

D IS T IC T
R

OF

C

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO SHORTEN TIME; C12-1376-EMC