Soto et al v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.
Filing
27
ORDER Scheduling Motion to Compel Arbitration.. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 6/26/12. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/5/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
Beth E. Terrell, CSB #178181
Email: bterrell@tmdwlaw.com
TERRELL MARSHALL DAUDT & WILLIE PLLC
936 North 34th Street, Suite 400
Seattle, Washington 98103-8869
Telephone: (206) 816-6603
Facsimile: (206) 350-3528
10
Steven N. Berk
Email: steven@berklawdc.com
Matthew J. Bonness, CSB #229226
Email: matt@berklawdc.com
BERK LAW PLLC
2002 Massachusetts Avenue, Northwest, Suite 100
Washington, District of Columbia 20036
Telephone: (202) 232-7550
Facsimile: (202) 232-7556
11
[Additional Counsel Appear on Signature Page]
12
Attorneys for Individual and Representative
Plaintiffs Alex Soto and Vince Eagen
6
7
8
9
13
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
16
ALEX SOTO and VINCE EAGEN, on behalf
of themselves and all others similarly situated,
17
Plaintiffs,
18
19
20
21
v.
AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC.,
Defendant.
Case No. 3:12-cv-01377-SI
JOINT STIPULATION
EXTENDING BRIEFING
SCHEDULE REGARDING
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO
COMPEL ARBITRATION AND
TO STAY PROCEEDINGS
CLASS ACTION
22
Complaint Filed: March 19, 2012
23
24
This stipulation is entered into by Plaintiffs Alex Soto and Vince Eagen (“Plaintiffs”)
25
and Defendant American Honda Motor Co., Inc. (“AHM” or “Defendant”) (collectively, the
26
27
JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE REGARDING
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND TO STAY
PROCEEDINGS - 1
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-01377-SI
1
“Parties”), by and through their respective counsel, with reference to the following facts and
2
recitals:
3
4
5
A.
Plaintiffs filed their Class Action Complaint in the subject action on March 19,
2012 (Dkt. #1);
B.
The parties subsequently stipulated to Plaintiffs filing an amended complaint
6
and to a proposed filing and briefing schedule regarding Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint
7
and Defendant’s response to the First Amended Complaint, which the Court approved by order
8
dated May 22, 2012 (Dkt. #12);
9
C.
Pursuant to the stipulated filing and briefing schedule, Plaintiffs filed their First
10
Amended Complaint on May 18, 2012 (Dkt. #11) and on June 8, 2012, Defendant filed an
11
Answer to Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint (Dkt. #15) as well as a Motion to Compel
12
Arbitration and Stay Proceedings as to Plaintiff Vince Eagen (Dkt. #16) (“Arbitration
13
Motion”);
14
D.
When agreeing to the earlier stipulated filing and briefing schedule on
15
Defendant’s response to the First Amended Complaint, Plaintiffs were unaware that Defendant
16
would file the Arbitration Motion;
17
E.
Plaintiffs have reviewed the Arbitration Motion and determined that limited
18
arbitration-related discovery is necessary to properly and completely respond to the Arbitration
19
Motion;
20
F.
Accordingly, counsel for the Parties have met and conferred with respect to
21
extending the briefing schedule and hearing date on the Arbitration Motion to permit Plaintiffs
22
to take limited arbitration-related discovery, and subject to the Court’s approval, agree to the
23
following:
24
25
26
27
JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE REGARDING
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND TO STAY
PROCEEDINGS - 2
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-01377-SI
EVENT
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
DATE
Plaintiffs to serve arbitration-related discovery including
subpoena for deposition to Third Party American Honda
Finance Corp.:
June 22, 2012
Defendant to respond to arbitration-related discovery:
August 6, 2012
Deadline for Plaintiffs to take any depositions in connection
with arbitration-related discovery:
August 16, 2012
Deadline for the Parties to file joint statement regarding
disputes, if any, regarding arbitration-related discovery:
August 20, 2012
September 4, 2012
10
Plaintiffs to file Opposition to Arbitration Motion, subject
to scheduling of deposition of Third Party American Honda
Finance Corp.:
11
Defendant to file Reply in Support of Arbitration Motion:
September 18, 2012
12
Proposed hearing date:
9
13
14
15
16
17
G.
October 5 , 2012 at 9:00 a.m.
The Parties agree that any arbitration-related discovery offered by AHM does
not constitute a waiver of AHM’s right to compel arbitration or to assert that discovery is a
gateway issue for the arbitrator to decide.
H.
No trial date has been set.
STIPULATED AND DATED this 21st day of June, 2012.
18
26
R NIA
FO
LI
ER
H
25
Judge S
RT
24
ston
usan Ill
NO
23
DERED
O OR
IT IS S
A
22
UNIT
ED
21
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
20
S
19
N
D IS T IC T
R
OF
C
27
JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE REGARDING
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND TO STAY
PROCEEDINGS - 3
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-01377-SI
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
TERRELL MARSHALL DAUDT
& WILLIE PLLC
LOEB & LOEB LLP
By: /s/Beth E. Terrell, CSB #178181
Beth E. Terrell, CSB #178181
Email: bterrell@tmdwlaw.com
936 North 34th Street, Suite 400
Seattle, Washington 98103-8869
Telephone: (206) 816-6603
Facsimile: (206) 350-3528
By: /s/ Denise A. Smith-Mars, CSB #215057
Michael L. Mallow, CSB #188745
Email: mmallow@loeb.com
Denise A. Smith-Mars, CSB# 215057
Email: dmars@loeb.com
10100 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 2200
Los Angeles, California 90067
Telephone: (310) 282-2000
Facsimile: (310) 282-2200
Steven N. Berk
Email: steven@berklawdc.com
Matthew J. Bonness, CSB #229226
Email: matt@berklawdc.com
BERK LAW PLLC
2002 Massachusetts Avenue,
Northwest, Suite 100
Washington, DC 20036
Telephone: (202) 232-7550
Facsimile: (202) 232-7556
Attorneys for Defendant
Michael F. Ram, CSB #104805
Email: mram@rocklawcal.com
RAM, OLSON, CEREGHINO
& KOPCZYNSKI
555 Montgomery Street, Suite 820
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 433-4949
Facsimile: (415) 433-7311
Attorneys for Individual and Representative
Plaintiffs Alex Soto and Vince Eagen
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE REGARDING
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND TO STAY
PROCEEDINGS - 4
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-01377-SI
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
1
2
3
4
5
I, Beth E. Terrell, hereby certify that on June 21, 2012, I electronically filed the
foregoing with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will send notification of
such filing to the following:
11
Michael L. Mallow, CSB #188745
Email: mmallow@loeb.com
Darlene M. Cho, CSB #251167
Email: dcho@loeb.com
Denise A. Smith-Mars, CSB# 215057
Email: dmars@loeb.com
LOEB & LOEB LLP
10100 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 2200
Los Angeles, California 90067
Telephone: (310) 282-2000
Facsimile: (310) 282-2200
12
Attorneys for Defendant
6
7
8
9
10
13
14
DATED this 21st day of June, 2012.
TERRELL MARSHALL DAUDT & WILLIE PLLC
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
By: /s/ Beth E. Terrell, CSB #178181
Beth E. Terrell, CSB #178181
Email: bterrell@tmdwlaw.com
936 North 34th Street, Suite 400
Seattle, Washington 98103-8869
Telephone: (206) 816-6603
Facsimile: (206) 350-3528
Attorneys for Individual and Representative
Plaintiffs Alex Soto and Vince Eagen
22
23
24
25
26
27
JOINT STIPULATION EXTENDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE REGARDING
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND TO STAY
PROCEEDINGS - 5
CASE NO. 3:12-CV-01377-SI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?