Jones v. City of Oakland et al

Filing 41

Discovery Order re Garcia deposition. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 6/19/2013. (cdnS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/19/2013)

Download PDF
1 BARBARA J. PARKER, City Attorney, SBN 069722 RANDOLPH W. HALL, Assistant City Atty., SBN 080142 2 WILLIAM E. SIMMONS, Supervising Trial Atty., SBN 121266 One Frank H. Ogawa Plaza, 6th Floor 3 Oakland, California 94612 Telephone: (510) 238-6520, Fax: (510) 238-6500 4 28889/954138 5 Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF OAKLAND 6 and CESAR GARCIA 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 10 11 TONY RAY JONES, an individual, Case No. CV 12-1416 MEJ 12 Plaintiff, 13 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER v. 14 CITY OF OAKLAND, a municipality; 15 CESAR GARCIA, individually and in his capacity as a police officer for the City of 16 Oakland; OFFICER DOES 1 through 10, and DOES 11 through 50, inclusive. 17 Defendant(s). 18 19 20 21 22 The Plaintiff and the City of Oakland defendants, by and through their respective counsel, agree and stipulate as follows: The deposition of Officer Cesar Garcia shall take place on June 25, 2013 at 10:00 a.m. and, if needed, on June 27, 2013 at 1:00 p.m. 23 24 25 26 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER -1- CV 12-1416 1 Dated: June 12, 2013 2 3 BARBARA J. PARKER, City Attorney RANDOLPH W. HALL, Chief Assistant City Attorney WILLIAM E. SIMMONS, Supervising Trial Attorney 4 5 By: 6 /S/ William E. Simmons Attorneys for Defendants CITY OF OAKLAND and CESAR GARCIA 7 8 WAUKEEN MCCOY LAW OFFICES OF WAUKEEN MCCOY 9 10 By: ____/s/ Waukeen Q. McCoy___________ Attorneys for Plaintiff TONY RAY JONES 11 12 13 UNITED STATES CHIEF MAGISTRATE JUDGE 17 Dated: June 19, 2013 S UNIT ED _____________________________________ 16 RT U O 15 S DISTRICT TE C TA 18 NO RT ER 21 A H 20 Jud LI 19 a James a-Elen ge Mari R NIA IT IS SO ORDERED FO 14 N F D IS T IC T O R C 22 23 24 25 26 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER -2- CV 12-1416

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?