Home Savings of America et al v. Felipe et al

Filing 34

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: A Joint Case Management Statement due by 3/1/2013. Case Management Conference set for 3/8/2013 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom C, 15th Floor, San Francisco. The ADR Completion Deadline extended to February 22, 2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 2/11/2013.(ls, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/11/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Jonathan M. Jenkins (State Bar No. 193011) jjenkins@jmjenkinslaw.com Emma D. Enriquez (State Bar No. 225059) eenriquez@jmjenkinslaw.com Regina Y. Yeh (State Bar No. 266019) ryeh@jmjenkinslaw.com JONATHAN M. JENKINS & ASSOCIATES 8075 W. Third St., Ste. 407 Los Angeles, California 90048 Telephone: (310) 984-6800 Fax: (310) 984-6840 Counsel for Plaintiff, FDIC as Receiver for Home Savings of America 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 HOME SAVINGS OF AMERICA, a federal savings and loan association, v. Plaintiff, EMELITA FELIPE, an individual, ANGELITO REYES, an individual d/b/a STREAMLINE APPRAISALS; CAL COAST FINANCIAL CORPORATION, a corporation doing business in California and DOES 1-20, CASE NO. CV 12-01419-LB [Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler Presiding] Cal. Sup. Ct. Case No.: RG11567893 SECOND STIPULATION TO MODIFY CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER; [PROPOSED] CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER Defendants. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, on October 15, 2012, the Court entered the Case Management Order, setting the pre-trial schedule with a trial date for March 24, 2014 and an ADR Completion Date for November 9, 2012; WHEREAS, the Court informed counsel that if any party were unable to comply with that date, that it should seek relief from this Court; SECOND STIPULATION TO MODIFY CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE AND [PROPOSED] CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER 1 WHEREAS, on November 14, 2012, after a meet and confer, the Parties 2 stipulated to continue the ADR Completion Date to February 8, 2013 (see Dkt. 31), 3 which this Court granted (see Dkt. 32); 4 WHEREAS, on or about January 29, 2013, FDIC learned that, due to a 5 conflicting FDIC event, its two appointed representatives assigned to this case would 6 no longer be able to attend the previously scheduled February 4, 2013 mediation date 7 agreed to by the Parties; 8 WHEREAS, that same day, FDIC’s counsel immediately informed all other 9 counsel and the mediator, Mr. Peter A. Mankin, Esq. of Sheldon & Mankin of the 10 11 need for a brief continuance; WHEREAS, the Parties have met and conferred with each other, as well as 12 their selected mediator, Mr. Peter Mankin, regarding a new mediation date, and have 13 confirmed February 20, 2013 as a date agreeable to all parties; 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 WHEREAS, the Parties have therefore agreed to modification of the pretrial schedule to accommodate FDIC’s conflicts; WHEREAS, the Parties also seek to continue the dates related to the Further Case Management Conference to occur following mediation; WHEREAS, the Parties’ agreed-upon modification of the pretrial schedule does not affect the March 24, 2014 trial date; WHEREAS, the Parties agree that except for the change of dates herein, all terms of the October 15, 2012 Case Management Order remains in effect. NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties STIPULATE and AGREE to the following pretrial schedule: 24 25 26 27 28 SECOND STIPULATION TO MODIFY CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE AND [PROPOSED] CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER 1 2 Case Event Filing Date / Disclosure Deadline / Hearing Date 3 Date to seek leave to add new parties or amend the 11/12/2012 4 pleadings 5 6 7 8 9 Updated Joint Case Management Conference 3/1/2013 Statement Further Case Management Conference: Court 3/8/2013 at 10:30 a.m. to discuss a June, 2013 trial date ADR completion date 2/22/2013 4/26/2013 12 Non-expert discovery completion date Expert disclosures required by Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rebuttal expert disclosures 13 Expert discovery completion date 10 11 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Last hearing date for dispositive motions and/or 25 26 27 28 5/24/2013 6/4/2013 5/8/2013, at 11:00 a.m. further case management conference Meet and confer re pretrial filings 2/11/2014 Pretrial filings due 2/20/2014 Oppositions, Objections, Exhibits, and Depo 2/27/2014 Designations due Final Pretrial Conference 3/13/2014, at 10:30 a.m. Trial (5 Days) 3/24/2014, at 8:30 a.m. 23 24 3/10/2013 WHEREAS, in the alternative, if this Court deems that a continuation of the dates of (1) the deadline to file the Further Case Management Conference Statement, and (2) the Further Case Management Conference, is unnecessary, than the Parties respectfully request that the only ADR Completion Date be continued to February 22, 2013. SECOND STIPULATION TO MODIFY CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE AND [PROPOSED] CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER 1 DATED: February 8, 2013 2 By /s/ Regina Y. Yeh Regina Y. Yeh Counsel for Plaintiff FDIC, as Receiver for Home Savings of America 3 4 5 JONATHAN MJENKINS & ASSOCIATES DATED: February 8, 2013 GELLER & ASSOCIATES 6 By /s/ Steven Geller Steven Geller Counsel for Defendant Angelito Reyes, individually, and dba Streamline Appraisals 7 8 9 10 DATED: February 8, 2013 LAW OFFICES OF DAVID G. FINKELSTEIN 11 12 By 13 14 Marc D. Bender Counsel for Defendant Cal Coast Financial Corporation 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED: The Case Management Order is hereby modified as follows: 1. The ADR Completion Date is hereby from February 8, 2013 to February 22, 2013; 2. The date to file the Joint Further Case Management Conference Statement is continued from February 14, 2013 to March 1, 2013; and 3. The Further Case Management Conference is continued from February 21, 2013 to March 8, 2013 at 10:30 a.m. in Courtroom C, 15th Floor. SO ORDERED. Date: _February 11, 2013 ________ ___By ____________________________________ THE HONORABLE LAUREL BEELER United States Magistrate Judge Presiding 27 28 SECOND STIPULATION TO MODIFY CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE AND [PROPOSED] CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?