Home Savings of America et al v. Felipe et al
Filing
34
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: A Joint Case Management Statement due by 3/1/2013. Case Management Conference set for 3/8/2013 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom C, 15th Floor, San Francisco. The ADR Completion Deadline extended to February 22, 2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler on 2/11/2013.(ls, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/11/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Jonathan M. Jenkins (State Bar No. 193011)
jjenkins@jmjenkinslaw.com
Emma D. Enriquez (State Bar No. 225059)
eenriquez@jmjenkinslaw.com
Regina Y. Yeh (State Bar No. 266019)
ryeh@jmjenkinslaw.com
JONATHAN M. JENKINS & ASSOCIATES
8075 W. Third St., Ste. 407
Los Angeles, California 90048
Telephone: (310) 984-6800
Fax: (310) 984-6840
Counsel for Plaintiff, FDIC as Receiver
for Home Savings of America
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
HOME SAVINGS OF AMERICA, a
federal savings and loan association,
v.
Plaintiff,
EMELITA FELIPE, an individual,
ANGELITO REYES, an individual d/b/a
STREAMLINE APPRAISALS; CAL
COAST FINANCIAL CORPORATION,
a corporation doing business in
California and DOES 1-20,
CASE NO. CV 12-01419-LB
[Magistrate Judge Laurel Beeler
Presiding]
Cal. Sup. Ct. Case No.:
RG11567893
SECOND STIPULATION TO
MODIFY CASE MANAGEMENT
ORDER; [PROPOSED] CASE
MANAGEMENT ORDER
Defendants.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, on October 15, 2012, the Court entered the Case Management
Order, setting the pre-trial schedule with a trial date for March 24, 2014 and an ADR
Completion Date for November 9, 2012;
WHEREAS, the Court informed counsel that if any party were unable to
comply with that date, that it should seek relief from this Court;
SECOND STIPULATION TO MODIFY CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE AND
[PROPOSED] CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
1
WHEREAS, on November 14, 2012, after a meet and confer, the Parties
2
stipulated to continue the ADR Completion Date to February 8, 2013 (see Dkt. 31),
3
which this Court granted (see Dkt. 32);
4
WHEREAS, on or about January 29, 2013, FDIC learned that, due to a
5
conflicting FDIC event, its two appointed representatives assigned to this case would
6
no longer be able to attend the previously scheduled February 4, 2013 mediation date
7
agreed to by the Parties;
8
WHEREAS, that same day, FDIC’s counsel immediately informed all other
9
counsel and the mediator, Mr. Peter A. Mankin, Esq. of Sheldon & Mankin of the
10
11
need for a brief continuance;
WHEREAS, the Parties have met and conferred with each other, as well as
12
their selected mediator, Mr. Peter Mankin, regarding a new mediation date, and have
13
confirmed February 20, 2013 as a date agreeable to all parties;
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
WHEREAS, the Parties have therefore agreed to modification of the pretrial
schedule to accommodate FDIC’s conflicts;
WHEREAS, the Parties also seek to continue the dates related to the Further
Case Management Conference to occur following mediation;
WHEREAS, the Parties’ agreed-upon modification of the pretrial schedule
does not affect the March 24, 2014 trial date;
WHEREAS, the Parties agree that except for the change of dates herein, all
terms of the October 15, 2012 Case Management Order remains in effect.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties STIPULATE and AGREE to the following
pretrial schedule:
24
25
26
27
28
SECOND STIPULATION TO MODIFY CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE AND
[PROPOSED] CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
1
2
Case Event
Filing Date / Disclosure Deadline /
Hearing Date
3
Date to seek leave to add new parties or amend the
11/12/2012
4
pleadings
5
6
7
8
9
Updated Joint Case Management Conference
3/1/2013
Statement
Further Case Management Conference: Court
3/8/2013 at 10:30 a.m.
to discuss a June, 2013 trial date
ADR completion date
2/22/2013
4/26/2013
12
Non-expert discovery completion date
Expert disclosures required by Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure
Rebuttal expert disclosures
13
Expert discovery completion date
10
11
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
Last hearing date for dispositive motions and/or
25
26
27
28
5/24/2013
6/4/2013
5/8/2013, at 11:00 a.m.
further case management conference
Meet and confer re pretrial filings
2/11/2014
Pretrial filings due
2/20/2014
Oppositions, Objections, Exhibits, and Depo
2/27/2014
Designations due
Final Pretrial Conference
3/13/2014, at 10:30 a.m.
Trial (5 Days)
3/24/2014, at 8:30 a.m.
23
24
3/10/2013
WHEREAS, in the alternative, if this Court deems that a continuation of the
dates of (1) the deadline to file the Further Case Management Conference Statement,
and (2) the Further Case Management Conference, is unnecessary, than the Parties
respectfully request that the only ADR Completion Date be continued to February 22,
2013.
SECOND STIPULATION TO MODIFY CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE AND
[PROPOSED] CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
1
DATED: February 8, 2013
2
By /s/ Regina Y. Yeh
Regina Y. Yeh
Counsel for Plaintiff FDIC, as Receiver for
Home Savings of America
3
4
5
JONATHAN MJENKINS & ASSOCIATES
DATED: February 8, 2013
GELLER & ASSOCIATES
6
By /s/ Steven Geller
Steven Geller
Counsel for Defendant Angelito Reyes,
individually, and dba Streamline Appraisals
7
8
9
10
DATED: February 8, 2013
LAW OFFICES OF DAVID G.
FINKELSTEIN
11
12
By
13
14
Marc D. Bender
Counsel for Defendant Cal Coast Financial
Corporation
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:
The Case Management Order is hereby modified as follows:
1. The ADR Completion Date is hereby from February 8, 2013 to February
22, 2013;
2. The date to file the Joint Further Case Management Conference Statement
is continued from February 14, 2013 to March 1, 2013; and
3. The Further Case Management Conference is continued from February 21,
2013 to March 8, 2013 at 10:30 a.m. in Courtroom C, 15th Floor.
SO ORDERED.
Date: _February
11, 2013
________
___By ____________________________________
THE HONORABLE LAUREL BEELER
United States Magistrate Judge Presiding
27
28
SECOND STIPULATION TO MODIFY CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE AND
[PROPOSED] CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?