United States of America v. One (1) 2008 Toyota Tundra

Filing 41

JOINT STATUS REPORT; ORDER. The case is stayed, with the exception of the pending motion for interlocutory sale, until February 21, 2014, by which time the parties shall file a further status report. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on August 22, 2013. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/22/2013)

Download PDF
MELINDA HAAG (CABN 132612) 1 United States Attorney 2 J. DOUGLAS WILSON (DCBN 412811) Chief, Criminal Division 3 ARVON J. PERTEET (CABN 242828) 4 Assistant United States Attorney 5 450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055 San Francisco, California 94102-3495 Telephone: (415) 436-6598 FAX: (415) 436-7234 ARVON.PERTEET@USDOJ.GOV 6 7 8 Attorneys for United States of America 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 12 13 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Plaintiff, v. ONE(1) 2008 TOYOTA TUNDRA, (VIN # 5TFDV58108X050994), ET AL., Defendants. ) CASE NO. CV 12-1439 MMC ) ) JOINT STATUS REPORT; ) ) [Proposed] ORDER ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, the United States of America, by and through MELINDA HAAG, United States Attorney, and ARVON J. PERTEET, Assistant United States Attorney, and Claimant 21 MATTHEW GRAVES by and through his attorney DAVID M. MICHAEL, ESQ., hereby 22 23 24 submit the following Joint Status Report. On March 12, 2012, the Government filed this civil forfeiture action against the defendant 25 properties. The basis alleged for this forfeiture action is that the defendant properties were used to 26 facilitate the manufacture, possession, cultivation, and distribution and the possession with the intent to 27 distribute marijuana. On or about December 18, 2012, the Government brought a criminal action against 28 JOINT STATUS REPORT CV 12-1439 MMC 30 1 claimant/defendant, MATTHEW GRAVES, in the matter of United States v. Matthew David Graves, 2 CR 12-0885 WHA, alleging possession with the intent to distribute marijuana. The criminal case also 3 alleges criminal forfeiture of the same property at issue in this civil forfeiture matter. On February 8, 4 2013, the Government filed a notice of related case in both case Nos. CV 12-01439 MMC, and CR 125 0885 WHA. The matter of United States v. Matthew David Graves, CR 12-0885 WHA, is currently set 6 for trial on September 9, 2013. 7 The civil forfeiture matter before this Court is currently stayed pending the resolution of the 8 9 criminal matter. However, the Government and claimant Umpqua Bank have filed a Motion for 10 Interlocutory Sale related to one of the defendant real properties. The motion was originally set to be 11 heard on September 13, 2013, before this Court. Docket Text 8/13/2013. Due to the unavailability of 12 counsel for claimant Graves, the parties have requested that this Court continue that hearing to October 13 14 11, 2013, with a modification of the briefing schedule. Doc 38, filed 8/14/2013 (Stipulation to Continue Hearing/[Proposed] Order). With the exception of the Motion for Interlocutory Sale, the parties request 15 16 that the case be stayed for an additional six months pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 981(g)(1) and (2). 17 18 Dated: August 14, 2013 MELINDA HAAG United States Attorney 19 20 S/ARVON J. PERTEET__ ARVON J. PERTEET Assistant United States Attorney 21 22 23 Dated: August 14, 2013 S/DAVID M. MICHAEL___ DAVID M. MICHAEL Attorney for Claimant MATTHEW D. GRAVES 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STATUS REPORT CV 12-1439 MMC 30 [Proposed] ORDER 1 2 3 Pursuant to the Joint Status Report, and with the exception of the pending hearing on Plaintiff’s 21 Motion for Interlocutory Sale, this case is further stayed until February ______ 2014, at which time the 4 5 parties shall file with the Court a further Status Report, or until such earlier time as further ordered by 6 this Court or requested by the parties. 7 8 9 Dated: August 22, 2013 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STATUS REPORT CV 12-1439 MMC 30 _________________________ MAXINE M. CHESNEY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?