United States of America v. One (1) 2008 Toyota Tundra

Filing 74

ORDER DIRECTING CLAIMANTS TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY OF DOCUMENT Claimants are ordered to immediately submit a chambers copy of their motion for indicative ruling. Defendants are advised that if they fail in the future to comply with the Courts S tanding Orders to provide a chambers copy of each electronically-filed document, the Court may impose sanctions, including, but not limited to, striking from the record any electronically-filed document of which a chambers copy has not been timely provided to the Court. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on April 1, 2015. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/1/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 11 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 No. C 12-1439 MMC ORDER DIRECTING CLAIMANTS TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY OF DOCUMENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL LOCAL RULES AND THE COURT’S STANDING ORDERS v. ONE (1) 2008 TOYOTA TUNDRA, (VIN # 5TFDV58108X050994), ET AL., 15 Defendants / 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On March 26, 2015, Tyrel Matthew Graves, Sensi Angelique Graves, William Oran Graves, and Mo Michael Graves (collectively, “claimants”) electronically filed a document titled “Motion for Indicative Ruling Regarding Motion for Reconsideration Based on Substantial New Evidence.” Claimants have violated the Civil Local Rules of this District and the Court’s Standing Orders, however, by failing “to provide for chambers a paper copy of each document that is electronically filed . . . marked ‘Chambers Copy’.” See Civil L.R. 5-1(e)(7); see also Standing Orders For Civil Cases Assigned to The Honorable Maxine M. Chesney ¶ 2. Claimaints are hereby ORDERED to comply with Civil Local Rule 5-1(e)(7) and the Court’s Standing Orders by immediately submitting a chambers copy of the abovereferenced document. Claimaints are hereby advised that if they fail in the future to comply with the Court’s Standing Orders to provide a chambers copy of each electronically-filed 1 document, the Court may impose sanctions, including, but not limited to, striking from the 2 record any electronically-filed document of which a chambers copy has not been timely 3 provided to the Court. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 Dated: April 1, 2015 MAXINE M. CHESNEY United States District Judge 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?