Ariba, Inc. v. Coupa Software Inc.

Filing 64

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE ENTRY OF EQUIPMENT INTO THE COURT PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER NO. 58 FOR THE MARKMAN HEARING re 61 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 09/11/2013. (Counsel or counsel's representative should have a hard copy of this order to present to security personnel when entering the building with equipment.)(jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/11/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Kelly C. Hunsaker (SBN 168307 / hunsaker@fr.com) Enrique D. Duarte (SBN 247523 / duarte@fr.com) FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. 500 Arguello Street, Suite 500 Redwood City, California 94063 Telephone: (650) 839-5070 Facsimile: (650) 839-5071 Robert T. Haslam (SBN 71134 / rhaslam@cov.com) Amy K. Van Zant (SBN 19742 / avanzant@cov.com) Hyun S. Byun (SBN 281753 / hbyun@cov.com) COVINGTON & BURLING LLP 333 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 700 Redwood Shores, CA 94065 Telephone: (650) 632-4700 Facsimile: (650) 632-4800 Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaimant COUPA SOFTWARE INC. Christine Saunders Haskett (SBN 188053 / chaskett@cov.com) Matthew D. Kellogg (SBN 280541 / mkellogg@cov.com Tess A. Hamilton (SBN 279738 / tahamilton@cov.com) COVINGTON & BURLING LLP One Front Street San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 591-6000 Facsimile: (415) 591-6091 7 8 9 10 11 12 Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counter-defendant ARIBA, INC. 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 (SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION) 17 18 19 20 21 22 ARIBA, INC., Case No. 3:12-cv-01484 WHO Plaintiff/Counter-defendant, STIPULATION AND ORDER RE ENTRY OF EQUIPMENT INTO THE COURT PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER NO. 58 FOR THE MARKMAN HEARING v. COUPA SOFTWARE INC., Date: September 13, 2013 Time: 9:00 a.m. Courtroom: 12, 19th Floor Judge: The Hon. William H. Orrick Defendant/Counter-plaintiff 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS, on Sept. 13, 2013, at 9:00 a.m., the Court is scheduled to hear the parties’ Markman arguments. WHEREAS, the parties intend to use projectors, related projection equipment, and laptop 1 STIP & ORDER RE ENTRY OF EQUIPMENT INTO THE COURT PER GEN ORDER NO. 58 FOR THE MARKMAN HRG. Case No. 4:12-cv-01484 WHO 1 computers during the Markman hearing. 2 NOW, THEREFORE, the parties respectfully request that the Court issue an order 3 permitting projectors, related projection equipment, and laptop computers to be brought into the 4 Courtroom to be used by the parties in making their arguments to the Court. 5 6 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 7 8 9 10 Dated: September 10, 2013 FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. COVINGTON & BURLING LLP By By: 11 12 Dated: September 10, 2013 /s/ Enrique D. Duarte Enrique D. Duarte Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaimant COUPA SOFTWARE INC. /s/ Amy K. Van Zant Amy K. Van Zant Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counter-defendant ARIBA, INC. 13 14 15 ORDER 16 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 17 Projectors, related projection equipment, and laptop computers may be brought into 18 Courtroom 12, 19th Floor, of the Courthouse of the United States District Court for the Northern 19 District of California, San Francisco Division, on Sept. 13, 2013 for the express purpose of 20 presenting the parties’ Markman arguments to the Court. 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 23 24 25 Dated: September 11, 2013 __________________________________ HON. WILLIAM H. ORRICK United States District Court Judge 26 27 28 2 STIP & ORDER RE ENTRY OF EQUIPMENT INTO THE COURT PER GEN ORDER NO. 58 FOR THE MARKMAN HRG. Case No. 4:12-cv-01484 WHO 1 2 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1, I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the signatory listed above. 3 4 Dated: __September 10, 2013 FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. By: 5 /s/ Enrique D. Duarte___________ Enrique D. Duarte 6 7 8 50920647.doc 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 STIP & ORDER RE ENTRY OF EQUIPMENT INTO THE COURT PER GEN ORDER NO. 58 FOR THE MARKMAN HRG. Case No. 4:12-cv-01484 WHO

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?