Perfect 10, Inc. v. Yandex N.V.

Filing 153

ORDER VACATING DISCOVERY HEARING AND REFERRING ALL DISCOVERY TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE [re 151 Letter filed by Yandex N.V., ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge for Discovery purposes, Motions terminated: 150 Discovery Letter Brief re Defendant Yandex N.V.'s Responses to Perfect 10's Requests for Production of Documents (Sets 1 and 2) filed by Perfect 10, Inc., 152 MOTION to Continue - Request for Continuance and [Proposed] Order for Continuance of May 23, 2013 Hearing Regarding Protective Order filed by Perfect 10, Inc.].. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 5/22/2013. (whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/22/2013)

1
2
3
4
5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9

PERFECT 10 INC., a California corporation,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14
15

Plaintiff,

No. C 12-01521 WHA

v.
YANDEX NV, a Netherlands limited liability
company, YANDEX LLC, a Russian limited
liability company, YANDEX INC., a Delaware
corporation, and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive,

ORDER VACATING
DISCOVERY HEARING
AND REFERRING ALL
DISCOVERY TO
MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Defendants.
/

16
17

In light of the unreasonable number of discovery disputes in this case, the pending and all

18

future discovery disputes are hereby REFERRED to a magistrate judge to be assigned. It is the

19

responsibility of counsel to make all discovery motions with sufficient lead time as to complete

20

allowable discovery within the existing case management schedule. PLEASE DO NOT ASK FOR

21
22
23

EXTENSIONS OF THE CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER ON ACCOUNT OF “DELAYS” BY THE
MAGISTRATE JUDGE IN RULING ON MOTIONS.

Please contact the magistrate judge assigned to

determine the appropriate way to renotice the motions.

24

The discovery hearing and further meet-and-confer set for May 23 are hereby VACATED.

25

IT IS SO ORDERED.

26
27
28

Dated: May 22, 2013.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE