Perfect 10, Inc. v. Yandex N.V.

Filing 179

ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO FILE SUR-REPLY by Judge Alsup denying 170 Motion for Leave to File; finding as moot 171 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; finding as moot 172 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal; denying 173 Motion for Leave to File (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/2/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
PERFECT 10, INC.,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER DENYING
REQUEST TO FILE
SUR-REPLY

YANDEX N.V., et al.,
Defendants.
/

15
16

No. C 12-01521 WHA

Plaintiff has filed a request for leave to file a sur-reply and an accompanying motion to

17

seal (Dkt. Nos. 170–73). Upon review of the material provisionally under seal, it is clear that the

18

proposed sur-reply is unnecessary. The request is accordingly DENIED. The accompanying

19

motion to seal is DENIED AS MOOT.

20
21

IT IS SO ORDERED.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated: July 1, 2013.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE