Perfect 10, Inc. v. Yandex N.V.

Filing 189

*** FILED IN ERROR. PLEASE SEE DOCKET # 190 *** Order by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu finding as moot 186 Discovery Letter Brief.(dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/12/2013) Modified on 7/12/2013 (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF).

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10
PERFECT 10 INC,

12

Plaintiff(s),

13

v.

14

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ EX
PARTE DISCOVERY LETTER
[DOCKET NO. 186] AS MOOT

YANDEX NV,

15

No. C-12-01521-WHA (DMR)

Defendant(s).
___________________________________/

16
17

The court is in receipt of Defendants’ ex parte discovery letter dated on July 11, 2013.

18

[Docket No. 186.] In that letter, Defendants’ seek an order compelling Plaintiff to permit

19

Defendants’ experts to confidential documents. Only July 12, 2013, Plaintiff filed a letter stating,

20

“To avoid burdening the Court, Perfect 10 agrees to allow Defendants[’] . . . experts to review

21

confidential and [Attorneys Eyes Only] material.” [Docket No. 188 at 1.] Thus, the issue raised in

22

Defendants’ letter appears to have been resolved.

23

Accordingly, Defendants’ letter is denied as moot.

24

IT IS SO ORDERED.

25
26

Dated: July 12, 2013

27
28

DONNA M. RYU
United States Magistrate Judge