Perfect 10, Inc. v. Yandex N.V.

Filing 221

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SEAL by Judge William Alsup [denying 205 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal]. (whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/6/2013)

1
2
3
4
5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8

PERFECT 10, INC.,

9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14

Plaintiff,

No. C 12-01521 WHA

v.
YANDEX N.V., a Netherlands limited
liability company; YANDEX INC., a
Delaware corporation; and YANDEX LLC,
a Russian limited liability company,

ORDER DENYING
MOTION TO SEAL

Defendants.
/

15
16

On July 24, plaintiff Perfect 10 filed an administrative motion to seal Perfect 10’s reply

17

brief to motion for sanctions and exhibit 1 to the declaration of Eric J. Bennet (Dkt. No. 205).

18

The motion is DENIED.

19

Civil Local Rule 79-5(d) states that within seven days of filing an administrative motion,

20

the designating party “must file with the Court and serve a declaration establishing that the

21

designated information is sealable, and must lodge a narrowly tailored proposed sealing order,

22

or must withdraw the designation of confidentiality.” Seven days have come and gone and

23

Yandex — the designating party — has not filed and served a declaration.

24
25
26
27
28

Pursuant to civil local rule 79-5(d), therefore, Perfect 10’s reply and exhibit 1 to the
declaration of Eric J. Bennet shall become part of the public record.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 6, 2013.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE