Cornerstone Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. James et al

Filing 458

ORDER by Judge Richard Seeborg granting 457 Plaintiff's Application for Order Directing the Release of Funds Posted as Security as Modified by The Court. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/2/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT—SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP ATTORNEYS AT LAW ONE CALIFORNIA PLAZA, 37TH FLOOR 300 SOUTH GRAND AVENUE LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90071-3147 HILL, FARRER & BURRILL LLP 10 11 12 CORNERSTONE STAFFING SOLUTIONS, INC., a California corporation, 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Plaintiff, vs. LARRY THAXTER JAMES, an individual; et al., Defendants. CASE NO. C12-01527 RS ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION FOR ORDER DIRECTING THE RELEASE OF FUNDS POSTED AS SECURITY AS MODIFIED BY COURT Complaint Filed: March 27, 2012 ______________________________ AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS 20 21 The funds on deposit with the Clerk of the Court pursuant to this Court’s 22 Order of April 9, 2012, in the sum of $100,000 plus accrued interest, less the 23 registry fee, shall be returned to CornerStone Staffing Inc. via check sent to its 24 counsel Neil Martin of Hill Farrer & Burrill LLP. 300 S Grand Ave., 37th Floor, 25 Los Angeles, CA 90071. 26 27 28 C12-01527 RS ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION FOR ORDER DIRECTING THE RELEASE OF FUNDS POSTED AS SECURITY 1 IT IS SO ORDERED 2 3 4 5 6 Dated: November 2, 2016 _____________________________ Richard Seeborg United States District Court Judge 7 8 9 A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP ATTORNEYS AT LAW ONE CALIFORNIA PLAZA, 37TH FLOOR 300 SOUTH GRAND AVENUE LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90071-3147 HILL, FARRER & BURRILL LLP 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- C12-01527 RS ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION FOR ORDER DIRECTING THE RELEASE OF FUNDS POSTED AS SECURITY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?