Former Shareholders of CardioSpectra, Inc. v. Volcano Corporation and Does 1-10

Filing 131

ORDER ENTERING TEMPORARY STAY OF ENFORCEMENT OF ATTORNEYS' FEES AWARD. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 1/15/2015. (mklS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/15/2015)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 CHRISTOPHER E BANAS, et al., Case No. 12-cv-01535-WHO Plaintiffs, 5 v. 6 7 VOLCANO CORPORATION, et al., Defendants. ORDER ENTERING TEMPORARY STAY OF ENFORCEMENT OF ATTORNEYS' FEES AWARD Re: Dkt. No. 129 8 9 10 On December 12, 2014, I awarded defendant Volcano $3,524,466.55 in attorneys’ fees and United States District Court Northern District of California 11 costs. Dkt. No. 126. Plaintiffs Christopher Banas and Paul Castella have filed a motion to stay 12 execution of the award pending appeal of the underlying orders granting Volcano summary 13 judgment and attorneys’ fees. Dkt. No. 129. Plaintiffs have also filed a motion to shorten time in 14 order to have the motion for a stay heard on January 21, 2015. Dkt. No. 130. Plaintiffs also 15 request that the Court immediately enter a temporary stay of enforcement of the fee award while 16 their motions to stay and to shorten time are pending. 17 18 19 Plaintiffs’ request for a temporary stay is GRANTED. Execution of the fee award is TEMPORARILY STAYED pending resolution of plaintiffs’ motion for a stay (Dkt. No. 126). If Volcano agrees that the motion for a stay should be heard on January 21, 2015, it should 20 notify plaintiffs’ counsel and Ms. Davis, my Courtroom Deputy, no later than 4:00 p.m. on 21 January 16, 2015, and file any responding papers by noon on Tuesday, January 20, 2015. If not, 22 pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-3(b), Volcano has until Tuesday, January 20, 2015, to oppose the 23 motion to shorten time, and I will set the hearing thereafter. 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 15, 2015 ______________________________________ WILLIAM H. ORRICK United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?