Former Shareholders of CardioSpectra, Inc. v. Volcano Corporation and Does 1-10
Filing
96
ORDER GRANTING PARTIES' MOTIONS TO SEAL AND REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE re 64 , 73 , 81 , and 86 Administrative Motions to File Under Seal. The documents listed in the order shall be filed under seal by the Clerk. The party which sought to file each document under seal shall ensure that a redacted version of each document is publicly accessible on the Court's electronic filing system (ECF), and that only the portions identified are redacted. The plaintiffs moved to file certain Woodward Declaration Exhibits under seal because these documents were apparently designated confidential by Volcano. Unless Volcano submits a declaration by 5:00 pm, Tuesday April 1, 2014 establishing that these documents are sealable, the plaintiff s shall file these documents on ECF not under seal. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 201, 79 Request for Judicial Notice filed by Volcano Corporation is GRANTED. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 03/31/2014. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/31/2014)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
CHRISTOPHER E BANAS, et al.,
Case No. 12-cv-01535-WHO
Plaintiffs,
8
v.
9
10
VOLCANO CORPORATION, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER GRANTING PARTIES’
MOTIONS TO SEAL AND REQUEST
FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE
Re: Dkt. Nos. 64, 73, 79, 81, 86
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
This order addresses the parties’ motions to file under seal and Volcano’s request for
14
judicial notice, filed in connection with the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment and the
15
plaintiffs’ motion for sanctions.
16
I. PARTIES’ MOTIONS TO SEAL
17
Upon good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the documents listed below
18
shall be filed under seal by the Clerk. The party which sought to file each document under seal
19
shall ensure that a redacted version of each document is publicly accessible on the Court’s
20
electronic filing system (ECF), and that only the portions identified below are redacted.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1. The Unredacted version of the Declaration of Martin Woodward in Support of Plaintiffs’
Motion for Partial Summary Judgment to which Plaintiffs’ Exhibits 2-5 and 9-11 are
attached;
2. The Unredacted version of Plaintiffs’ Notice of Motion and Memorandum of Points and
Authorities in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment.
3. The document titled “Agreement and Plan of Merger” contained within Exhibit 9 to the
Declaration of Martin Woodward in Support of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Summary
Judgment (the “Woodward Declaration”), bearing bates labels VOLCANO_00046942
through VOLCANO_00047014.
4. Pages 6-8, 10-12, and 14-29 of the presentation contained within Exhibit 10 to the
1
2
Woodward Declaration, bearing bates labels VOLCANO_00047166 through
VOLCANO_00047168, VOLCANO_00047170 through VOLCANO_00047172, and
VOLCANO_00047174 through VOLCANO_00047189.
4
5. Pages 6 and 10-18 of the presentation contained within Exhibit 11 to the Woodward
Declaration, bearing bates labels VOLCANO_00047367 and VOLCANO_00047371
through VOLCANO_00047379.
5
6. Exhibit 26 to the Woodward Declaration, titled “Expert Report of Dr. Zvi Ladin, Ph.D.”
6
7. Exhibits 30-31, 42-43, and 45 to the Woodward Declaration, bearing bates labels
VOLCANO_00126384 through VOLCANO_00126392, VOLCANO_00173380 through
VOLCANO_00173416,
VOLCANO_00063076
through
VOLCANO_00063133,
VOLCANO_00063149 through VOLCANO_00063163, and VOLCANO_00241735
through VOLCANO_00241763.
3
7
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
8. Exhibits 32 and 54 to the Woodward Declaration, bearing bates labels
VOLCANO_00078024 through VOLCANO_00078028 and VOLCANO_00343340
through VOLCANO_00343343, and the quoting of such exhibits appearing in Plaintiffs’
Opposition at footnote 71 on page 17.
9. Exhibits 34, 37-38, and 48 to the Woodward Declaration, bearing bates labels
VOLCANO_00094799 through VOLCANO_00094818, VOLCANO_00193416 through
VOLCANO_00193436, VOLCANO_00168552 through VOLCANO_00168576, and
VOLCANO_00267670 through VOLCANO_00267707.
10. Exhibit OO (in its entirety) filed in support of Volcano’s Reply in Support of its Motion
for Summary Judgment;
11. Exhibit SS (in its entirety) filed in support of Volcano’s Reply in Support of its Motion for
Summary Judgment;
12. Exhibit TT (in its entirety) filed in support of Volcano’s Reply in Support of its Motion
for Summary Judgment; and
13. Exhibit UU (email attachment only) filed in support of Volcano’s Reply in Support of its
Motion for Summary Judgment;
14. The Unredacted version of the Declaration of Scott A. Kitner in Support of Plaintiffs’
Motion for Sanctions, including Exhibit 6 attached thereto (containing previously-filed
Exhibits OO and TT).
The plaintiffs moved to file Woodward Declaration Exhibits 2-5, 16-25, 27-29, 33, 35-36,
39-41, 44, 46-47, 49-53, 55-62 under seal because these documents were apparently designated
confidential by Volcano. Volcano evidently no longer believes these documents are confidential.
Unless Volcano submits a declaration by 5:00 pm, Tuesday April 1, 2014 establishing that
28
2
1
these documents are sealable, the plaintiffs shall file these documents on ECF not under seal.
2
II. VOLCANO’S REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE
3
Volcano requests that the Court take judicial notice of information made publicly available
4
on the website of the United States Food & Drug Administration (“FDA”) in a document labeled
5
“IDE Guidance Memorandum #D99-1 – Pre-IDE Program: Issues and Answers” and dated March
6
25, 1999 (“FDA Guidance”). Dkt. No. 79 (exhibit VV). The plaintiffs do not object to the
7
request. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 201, the request is GRANTED.
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 31, 2014
______________________________________
WILLIAM H. ORRICK
United States District Judge
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?